| Probblem with XSD generated model editor [message #598278] |
Tue, 27 June 2006 16:27 |
 Daniel Mahler
Messages: 53
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I have an XSD which contains the following.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++
<xs:element name="triple" substitutionGroup="rng:pattern">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="ccs:term-exp"/>
<xs:element ref="ccs:term-exp"/>
<xs:element ref="ccs:term-exp"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="row"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="term-exp" abstract="true"/>
<xs:element name="var" substitutionGroup="ccs:term-exp" type="xs:NCName"/>
<xs:element name="term" substitutionGroup="ccs:term-exp"
type="xs:anyURI"/>
<xs:element name="literal" substitutionGroup="ccs:term-exp"
type="xs:string"/>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++
I have created an EMF plugin from it in the textbook way.
However, when I use the generated model editor,
it tries to force each of the three children of triple to be a different
type (var/term/literal).
If I make the first child <term>, then the Term Type option is greyed out in
the menu for the next child.
If I edit a model in the text editor:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ccs:triple xmlns:ccs="http://www.rightscom.com/ns/ccs">
<ccs:term>a</ccs:term>
<ccs:term>b</ccs:term>
<ccs:term>c</ccs:term>
</ccs:triple>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++
and then open it with the model editor
then I only see (with folding fully expanded)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++
* platform ...
* Document Root
* <triple> Triple Type
* <term> c
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++
and I do not seem to be able to get at the
<ccs:term>b</ccs:term>
<ccs:term>c</ccs:term>
components
I do not understand why the model editor wants to make the childerent
distinct.
To my best understanding the schema does not imply the constraint.
thanks
Daniel
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03215 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
