Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » Objectteams » OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real
OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real [message #574152] Fri, 07 May 2010 12:21 Go to next message
Stephan Herrmann is currently offline Stephan HerrmannFriend
Messages: 1853
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
After our warm-up release 0.7.0 M1, I have uploaded the second
milestone release to the Eclipse server. In contrast to the
cautionary words accompanying M1, the new Milestone 2 brings
the OTDT back to the maturity and quality it had before the
big move to Eclipse.org.

Milestone 2 passes a total of 49267 unit tests:
- 42654 JDT regression tests
- 6613 OT/J specific tests.

Milestone 2 is based on Eclipse SDK 3.6.0 M7 and should also
be compatible with other Eclipse Packages due today.

More on downloading/installing:
http://www.eclipse.org/objectteams/download.php

Migrating existing projects from OTDT 1.x to 0.7.x is supported
by a set of special errors & quickfixes. Read more at:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/OTHowtos/Migrating_Projects_To_0.7

Here is the list of issues resolved in Milestone 2:

http://bugs.eclipse.org/310621 [compiler] should warn when after callin ignores return value of its role method
http://bugs.eclipse.org/310995 [hierarchy] Support quick hierarchy for role methods
http://bugs.eclipse.org/311201 [compiler] hasRole(Object, Class) call in inner teams ends up in NoSuchMethodError
http://bugs.eclipse.org/311339 [dom] Quickfix "Add Return Statement" inserts invalid code
http://bugs.eclipse.org/311432 [rewrite] Inferred callouts to private static fields make OrganizeImports to import private fields
http://bugs.eclipse.org/308029 Automatically migrate OT-projects to new namespace
http://bugs.eclipse.org/311109 nested teams must be specified using their internal name with "$__OT__"
http://bugs.eclipse.org/311206 Adding InnerTeam for aspectBinding with the PDE Extension Editor results in wrong code

Happy downloading
Stephan

PS: Don't you think the OTDT could gather more than 20 votes
on the new http://marketplace.eclipse.org/ so it would make it into the
top 10 list? :)
Re: OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real [message #574174 is a reply to message #574152] Wed, 19 May 2010 03:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pinghe Mising name is currently offline pinghe Mising nameFriend
Messages: 13
Registered: March 2010
Junior Member
When released OT/J command line compiler?
Re: OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real [message #574187 is a reply to message #574174] Wed, 19 May 2010 13:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stephan Herrmann is currently offline Stephan HerrmannFriend
Messages: 1853
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
pinghe wrote on Tue, 18 May 2010 23:08
> When released OT/J command line compiler?


Thanks for asking, I actually forgot the command line compiler
when migrating the build process to Eclipse.org.

For now I have uploaded a snapshot to
http://download.eclipse.org/objectteams/ecotj/ecotj-I2010051 90940.jar

I should mention that this version already contains the
change from https://bugs.eclipse.org/310917
which changes the way precedences affect "after" callin bindings.

hope this helps, next build should again include a matching
command line compiler.

best,
Stephan
Re: OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real [message #574202 is a reply to message #574187] Thu, 20 May 2010 05:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pinghe Mising name is currently offline pinghe Mising nameFriend
Messages: 13
Registered: March 2010
Junior Member
thanks.
Re: OTDT 0.7.0 M2 - this is real [message #574218 is a reply to message #574152] Thu, 20 May 2010 08:51 Go to previous message
pinghe Mising name is currently offline pinghe Mising nameFriend
Messages: 13
Registered: March 2010
Junior Member
There is another problem. lombok Not working. Please refer to the following contents.

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-lomb ok/index.html
Previous Topic:Base Imports
Next Topic:OTDT 0.7.0 M3 - approaching Helios
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 25 11:38:20 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03815 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top