|
|
| Re: AMW + QVT [message #630127 is a reply to message #629621] |
Thu, 30 September 2010 17:00   |
 Toñi Reina
Messages: 209
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Marco,
you are refering to the semi-automatic generation of weaving models,
aren't you?
That is, in a scenario in which weaving models are generated
manually, is it possible to use QVT transformations instead of ATL
transformations?
El 29/09/2010 2:27, Marcos Didonet Del Fabro escribió:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation has been done focusing on ATL. As far as I
> know, there is no QVT equivalent.
>
> In order to do it, it would be necessary to replace the ATL metamodel
> and transformations by the QVT ones...
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Marcos.
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMW + QVT [message #631235 is a reply to message #631190] |
Wed, 06 October 2010 16:11 |
Toñi Reina
Messages: 209
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi,
thanks for your answer. If transformations are created outside the
tool, then the functionality of amw is reduced to create weaving models.
That is, I don't have to create the weaving metamodel and I have an
editor to create weaving models, am I right?
Regards,
Toñi
El 06/10/2010 16:13, Marcos Didonet Del Fabro escribió:
> Hi
>
> I am refering to both cases, since both implementations are based on the
> same core components.
>
> This means there is no QVT-implementation available, but it is possible
> to use QVT inside the tool if you extend the existing mecanism.
> Otherwise, you as well may create the QVT transformations and execute
> them outside the tool, by taking a weaving model as input parameter,
>
> Marcos.
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02964 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
