Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » Sapphire » Intro blog comment from André
Intro blog comment from André [message #542864] Sat, 26 June 2010 21:07 Go to next message
Konstantin Komissarchik is currently offline Konstantin KomissarchikFriend
Messages: 1077
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
wow, very cool stuff, I'm impressed. These kind of UI abstractions for SWT arose many times already but most of them didn't get very mature nor wide spread. Hope this will change with saphire. We really lack this commodity in SWT.
The only thing that catched my eyes is that you use XML. I think that there are better/simpler markups (less clutter). Glimmer (for example) came with an interesting grammar with that looked similar to YAML. Any thoughts?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Intro blog comment from André [message #542866 is a reply to message #542864] Sat, 26 June 2010 21:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Konstantin Komissarchik is currently offline Konstantin KomissarchikFriend
Messages: 1077
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I agree completely about the clutter of XML. The Sapphire UI framework is architected around a UI definition model rather than a specific syntax. The syntax is currently XML partly because it is extensible (third parties contributing new UI parts) and partly because there happens to be very good model-to-XML binding support available in Sapphire and partly because Eclipse has an XML editor.

I would like to explore an alternative syntax at some point. With tools like Xtext, the cost of inventing a new language is dropping, which undermines the advantage of using XML.

The other way that we intend to further simplify authoring of UI definitions is by building an editor that frees the user from manipulating the definitions at text level. Initially this editor will be form-based, but I can see it evolving into a graphical WYSIWYG editor at some point in the future.

In any case, thanks for your interest and I hope you follow the Sapphire project as it gets off the ground and maybe join the party.

- Konstantin

Report message to a moderator

Re: Intro blog comment from André [message #561017 is a reply to message #542864] Sat, 26 June 2010 21:25 Go to previous message
Konstantin Komissarchik is currently offline Konstantin KomissarchikFriend
Messages: 1077
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I agree completely about the clutter of XML. The Sapphire UI framework is architected around a UI definition model rather than a specific syntax. The syntax is currently XML partly because it is extensible (third parties contributing new UI parts) and partly because there happens to be very good model-to-XML binding support available in Sapphire and partly because Eclipse has an XML editor.

I would like to explore an alternative syntax at some point. With tools like Xtext, the cost of inventing a new language is dropping, which undermines the advantage of using XML.

The other way that we intend to further simplify authoring of UI definitions is by building an editor that frees the user from manipulating the definitions at text level. Initially this editor will be form-based, but I can see it evolving into a graphical WYSIWYG editor at some point in the future.

In any case, thanks for your interest and I hope you follow the Sapphire project as it gets off the ground and maybe join the party.

- Konstantin

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:Intro blog comment from André
Next Topic:Combine experience
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 21:25:50 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03416 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly