|
|
|
|
|
Re: [check] [message #534787 is a reply to message #534764] |
Thu, 20 May 2010 10:52 |
|
Hello,
I can reproduce the problem using a "default" workflow.
Could you please file a Bug for it. Don't know if it is a Bug or a Feature (Dynamic EMF Registration of the Reader), but we'll see.
You can get it running anyway when you modifying the stuff (workflow) like this:
(snippets from good old oaw 4.3.1)
<bean class="org.eclipse.mwe.emf.StandaloneSetup" >
<platformUri value=".."/>
<registerEcoreFile value="src/metamodel/metamodel.ecore" />
</bean>
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de
[Updated on: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:53] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [check] [message #535247 is a reply to message #535208] |
Fri, 21 May 2010 17:47 |
|
Hello,
downloaded the RC1 distribution and found the plugins:
- org.eclipse.xtend.util.stdlib 1.0.0.v201005180835
- org.eclipse.xtend.typesystem.emf 1.0.0.v201005180835
So I cannot reproduce your problem.
Regards
Christian
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [check] [message #536185 is a reply to message #536147] |
Thu, 27 May 2010 10:43 |
|
Hi,
you are mixing MetaMetaModel, MetaModel and Model:
(1) public static boolean val (EClass e)
Here you are working on MetaMetaModel level
(2) context Entities::Attribute ERROR msg('test.0'):
pins((EClass)this)
;
here you define a check rule for a MetaClass = element of the MetaModel
thereby this is a Instance of this MetaClass which is an EObject in Ecore case
~Christian
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03283 seconds