|
Re: The JobManager's lock question [message #532126 is a reply to message #532072] |
Fri, 07 May 2010 09:11 |
Rüdiger Herrmann Messages: 581 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
we recently solved this bug:
283490: Display.syncExec() leads to deadlock
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=283490
With these changes, the described problem shouldn't occur any more. If
you still experience problems, please file a bugzilla with standalone
code to reproduce.
BTW, making the JobManager a session-singleton would make Jobs that are
session-independent impossible and hence isn't an option.
Regards,
Rüdiger
--
Rüdiger Herrmann
http://eclipsesource.com
On 07.05.2010 06:59, andijo wrote:
> I run a test that using the Job, and I find that when mutil user will
> wait for the JobManger's global lock, and so the UIThread is blocked, so
> can I change the JobManager's source to extend SessionSingletonBase, and
> in this case, means one user one JobManager's lock, so mutil user will
> not wait the global lock.
> Is this solution will resolve the mutil user wait for lock's problem?
>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03737 seconds