Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » IAM (Eclipse Integration for Apache Maven) » no news is good news?
no news is good news? [message #4678] Fri, 14 March 2008 06:55 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net

Almost no traffic on this newsgroup.
Not even an announcement of new version.

Is this newsgroup dead?

--
This space was intended to be left blank.
Re: no news is good news? [message #4747 is a reply to message #4678] Fri, 14 March 2008 10:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Abel Mui is currently offline Abel MuiFriend
Messages: 247
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.

IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
Re: no news is good news? [message #4884 is a reply to message #4747] Fri, 14 March 2008 10:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net

Abel Muiño wrote:
> Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
> contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
> interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.
>
> IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
> support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
>

When will q4e code base migrate to eclipse.org?
What are we waiting for? legal review? community input? or what?

--
This space was intended to be left blank.
Re: no news is good news? [message #5019 is a reply to message #4884] Fri, 14 March 2008 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Abel Mui is currently offline Abel MuiFriend
Messages: 247
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
to the incubation phase.

The objective of this phase is:
The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the community,
collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the proposal.
Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.

( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).

So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
(for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
searching for mentors.

What can you do to help?
Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful it
is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which are
missing from the proposal should be considered.

Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense (note,
we're not actually talking about implementations at this point). Show if
there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.

Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of demonstrating
that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community in the project.
Re: no news is good news? [message #5155 is a reply to message #5019] Fri, 14 March 2008 17:10 Go to previous message
Carlos Sanchez is currently offline Carlos SanchezFriend
Messages: 40
Registered: July 2009
Member
The tircky part is to find the mentors, so if you know somebody in the
Architecture Council
http://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/council.php
just bug them until they agree to mentor the project ;)
I plan to do it too next week at EclipseCON

Abel Muiño wrote:
> We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
> to the incubation phase.
>
> The objective of this phase is:
> The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the
> community, collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the
> proposal. Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.
>
> ( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).
>
> So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
> (for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
> searching for mentors.
>
> What can you do to help?
> Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful
> it is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which
> are missing from the proposal should be considered.
>
> Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense
> (note, we're not actually talking about implementations at this point).
> Show if there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.
>
> Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of
> demonstrating that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community
> in the project.
>
Re: no news is good news? [message #564987 is a reply to message #4678] Fri, 14 March 2008 10:50 Go to previous message
Abel Mui is currently offline Abel MuiFriend
Messages: 247
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.

IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
Re: no news is good news? [message #565028 is a reply to message #4747] Fri, 14 March 2008 10:58 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net

Abel Muiño wrote:
> Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
> contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
> interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.
>
> IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
> support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
>

When will q4e code base migrate to eclipse.org?
What are we waiting for? legal review? community input? or what?

--
This space was intended to be left blank.
Re: no news is good news? [message #565088 is a reply to message #4884] Fri, 14 March 2008 11:40 Go to previous message
Abel Mui is currently offline Abel MuiFriend
Messages: 247
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
to the incubation phase.

The objective of this phase is:
The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the community,
collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the proposal.
Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.

( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).

So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
(for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
searching for mentors.

What can you do to help?
Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful it
is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which are
missing from the proposal should be considered.

Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense (note,
we're not actually talking about implementations at this point). Show if
there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.

Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of demonstrating
that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community in the project.
Re: no news is good news? [message #565152 is a reply to message #5019] Fri, 14 March 2008 17:10 Go to previous message
Carlos Sanchez is currently offline Carlos SanchezFriend
Messages: 40
Registered: July 2009
Member
The tircky part is to find the mentors, so if you know somebody in the
Architecture Council
http://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/council.php
just bug them until they agree to mentor the project ;)
I plan to do it too next week at EclipseCON

Abel Muiño wrote:
> We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
> to the incubation phase.
>
> The objective of this phase is:
> The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the
> community, collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the
> proposal. Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.
>
> ( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).
>
> So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
> (for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
> searching for mentors.
>
> What can you do to help?
> Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful
> it is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which
> are missing from the proposal should be considered.
>
> Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense
> (note, we're not actually talking about implementations at this point).
> Show if there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.
>
> Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of
> demonstrating that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community
> in the project.
>
Previous Topic:EclipseCON
Next Topic:EclipseCON
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 07:59:07 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03003 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top