Home » Modeling » Epsilon » samples of inter-model consystency
| | | |
Re: samples of inter-model consystency [message #520039 is a reply to message #520030] |
Wed, 10 March 2010 21:57 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Paolatco,
paolatco wrote:
> Hi Drimitri.
> Thanks a lot! it works perfect!
>
>>>
>>> Where can i find a sample of it? And, can i used in the EVL+GMF
>>> integration?
>>
>> It would help if you could elaborate a bit on what you are trying to
>> achieve.
>
> Right now i don't have an example :blush:
No worries :) In any case it was a good opportunity for adding another
example.
I'm gonna learn a little
> bit more for publish an example of what i want. The general idea is that
> I get several diagrams of the same object definitions, for instance a
> component, i get the deployment diagram and the class diagram. I would
> like to validate, if it's possible, with inter-model consistency that
> the component A is defined in both views, the deployment and the class
> diagram.
That would fit in very nicely with the inter-model consistency checking
features of EVL indeed.
>
>
> Thank you, very much, for the fast answer.
You're welcome!
Cheers,
Dimitris
--
Spread the word: http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/epsilon/spreadtheword
Follow Epsilon on Twitter: http://twitter.com/epsilonews
|
|
| | |
Re: samples of inter-model consystency [message #587360 is a reply to message #520030] |
Wed, 10 March 2010 21:57 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Paolatco,
paolatco wrote:
> Hi Drimitri.
> Thanks a lot! it works perfect!
>
>>>
>>> Where can i find a sample of it? And, can i used in the EVL+GMF
>>> integration?
>>
>> It would help if you could elaborate a bit on what you are trying to
>> achieve.
>
> Right now i don't have an example :blush:
No worries :) In any case it was a good opportunity for adding another
example.
I'm gonna learn a little
> bit more for publish an example of what i want. The general idea is that
> I get several diagrams of the same object definitions, for instance a
> component, i get the deployment diagram and the class diagram. I would
> like to validate, if it's possible, with inter-model consistency that
> the component A is defined in both views, the deployment and the class
> diagram.
That would fit in very nicely with the inter-model consistency checking
features of EVL indeed.
>
>
> Thank you, very much, for the fast answer.
You're welcome!
Cheers,
Dimitris
--
Spread the word: http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/epsilon/spreadtheword
Follow Epsilon on Twitter: http://twitter.com/epsilonews
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Mar 29 11:01:14 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08616 seconds
|