|
|
|
|
Re: Importing XSD (who uses hypermodel ?) [message #510314 is a reply to message #510189] |
Wed, 27 January 2010 08:39 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33140 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Vlad,
Comments below.
Vlad Varnica wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Quote:
>> Considered by whom? Part of EMF's success lies in being inclusive and
>> helping to provide data integration for models specified as XML Schemas.
>
> I agree with you but I am always very disappointed by EMF trying to
> target any XML schema and not to be dedicated to UML needs.
There's obviously no pleasing everyone. The real world is rife with
schemas and there's a real need to bind those to usable Java APIs. EMF
does that an a large portion of EMF's client base exploits that.
Supporting UML is a relative small part of what EMF is about.
> This is the biggest EMF historical mistake and this is why EMF will
> never have the success it would have deserve !!
Obviously I don't agree. Supporting things other than UML is important
to the community. The real problem for you seems to be that the EMF
community isn't purely just a UML community.
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
|
Re: Importing XSD (who uses hypermodel ?) [message #625481 is a reply to message #625480] |
Wed, 27 January 2010 08:39 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33140 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Vlad,
Comments below.
Vlad Varnica wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Quote:
>> Considered by whom? Part of EMF's success lies in being inclusive and
>> helping to provide data integration for models specified as XML Schemas.
>
> I agree with you but I am always very disappointed by EMF trying to
> target any XML schema and not to be dedicated to UML needs.
There's obviously no pleasing everyone. The real world is rife with
schemas and there's a real need to bind those to usable Java APIs. EMF
does that an a large portion of EMF's client base exploits that.
Supporting UML is a relative small part of what EMF is about.
> This is the biggest EMF historical mistake and this is why EMF will
> never have the success it would have deserve !!
Obviously I don't agree. Supporting things other than UML is important
to the community. The real problem for you seems to be that the EMF
community isn't purely just a UML community.
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03277 seconds