Home » Modeling » EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc) » EODM release date
| EODM release date [message #4359] |
Sun, 27 November 2005 19:00  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: serge.squidsolutions.com
I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
thx,
Serge
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #4428 is a reply to message #4359] |
Sun, 27 November 2005 19:58  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Serge,
The code is being reviewed by the Eclipse.org legal department and there
isn't a projected completion date.
Serge Fantino wrote:
> I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
> Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
> against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
>
> thx,
> Serge
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #4497 is a reply to message #4428] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 20:50 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: serge.squidsolutions.com
Is it a good news? Does that mean that the legal process may not succeed?
S.
Ed Merks wrote:
> Serge,
>
> The code is being reviewed by the Eclipse.org legal department and there
> isn't a projected completion date.
>
>
> Serge Fantino wrote:
>
>> I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
>> Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
>> against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
>>
>> thx,
>> Serge
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #4567 is a reply to message #4497] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 21:26 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Serge,
I just got a note today that it's been approved. So now it's a matter
of committing the code to CVS and producing builds. There's a small
chance we could have it available before the new year...
Serge Fantino wrote:
> Is it a good news? Does that mean that the legal process may not succeed?
>
> S.
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> Serge,
>>
>> The code is being reviewed by the Eclipse.org legal department and
>> there isn't a projected completion date.
>>
>>
>> Serge Fantino wrote:
>>
>>> I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
>>> Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
>>> against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
>>>
>>> thx,
>>> Serge
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #9817 is a reply to message #4567] |
Wed, 04 January 2006 06:56 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Gordon.xxx.xx
Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #9862 is a reply to message #9817] |
Thu, 05 January 2006 20:36 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: serge.squidsolutions.com
Gordon wrote:
> Serge,
>
> Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
> provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>
Gordon,
thank you for the update - do you have a schedule in mind ?
Serge.
|
|
| |
| Re: EODM release date [message #10112 is a reply to message #9907] |
Tue, 10 January 2006 22:10 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: paul.socialphysics.org
We also anxiously await the provisioning of an official version of EODM. The
Higgins project integrated an early "evaluation only" release of EODM.jar
from the IBM alphaworks site many moons ago. Once available from EMFT, we
would no longer have to tell folks to go to download a copy from alphaworks
just to play with Higgins.
Paul
"Dave Carlson" <dcarlson@xmlmodeling.com> wrote in message
news:dpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Gordon,
>
> I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
> project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
> adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
> opinion on this?
>
> I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
> over 6 months...
>
> Thanks,
> Dave Carlson
>
> "Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
> news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>> Serge,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>> provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #12308 is a reply to message #9907] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 16:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020606070706010805070009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave,
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.
Dave Carlson wrote:
>Gordon,
>
>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>opinion on this?
>
>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>over 6 months...
>
>Thanks,
> Dave Carlson
>
>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>
>>Serge,
>>
>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--------------020606070706010805070009
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dave,<br>
<br>
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------020606070706010805070009--
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #12319 is a reply to message #12308] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 17:39 |
 Dave Carlson
Messages: 402
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be the =
only orphan left in emft.
Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling project? =
I'd like to dial in for it.
Dave
"Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message =
news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
Dave,
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed =
under the new top-level modeling project.
Dave Carlson wrote:=20
Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling=20
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to =
suggest=20
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have =
an=20
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for =
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message=20
news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on=20
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an =
obvious=20
change, else EODM would be the only orphan left in emft.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is there any schedule for a creation =
review of the=20
new modeling project? I'd like to dial in for it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dave</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Ed Merks" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org">news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.ecli=
pse.org</A>...</DIV>Dave,<BR><BR>It's=20
merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed =
under the=20
new top-level modeling project.<BR><BR><BR>Dave Carlson wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmiddpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org =
type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling=20
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to =
suggest=20
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have =
an=20
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for =
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></A> wrote in message =
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340=
ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</A>...
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on=20
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D""><!---->
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680--
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #12328 is a reply to message #12319] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 18:03 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000307060902030504040603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave,
No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs to
be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
Dave Carlson wrote:
> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
> the only orphan left in emft.
>
> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>
> Dave
>
> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
> Dave,
>
> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
> under the new top-level modeling project.
>
>
> Dave Carlson wrote:
>
>>Gordon,
>>
>>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>>opinion on this?
>>
>>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>>over 6 months...
>>
>>Thanks,
>> Dave Carlson
>>
>>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>
>>
>>>Serge,
>>>
>>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--------------000307060902030504040603
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dave,<br>
<br>
No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs
to be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middqja4m$tq1$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an
obvious change, else EODM would be the only orphan left in emft.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Is there any schedule for a creation
review of the new modeling project? I'd like to dial in for it.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Dave</font></div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div>"Ed Merks" <<a href="mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</a>>
wrote in message <a href="news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org">news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org</a>...</div>
Dave,<br>
<br>
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000307060902030504040603--
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #14411 is a reply to message #12328] |
Thu, 19 January 2006 21:41 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: serge.squidsolutions.com
Sadly I can't see any announce of availibility for EODM...
Christmas is gone for a while now, and Santa didn't bring a relase...
Serge.
Ed Merks wrote:
> Dave,
>
> No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs to
> be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
>
>
> Dave Carlson wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
>> the only orphan left in emft.
>>
>> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
>> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
>> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
>> Dave,
>>
>> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
>> under the new top-level modeling project.
>>
>>
>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>
>>>Gordon,
>>>
>>>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>>>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>>>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>>>opinion on this?
>>>
>>>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>>>over 6 months...
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>> Dave Carlson
>>>
>>>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Serge,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #14436 is a reply to message #14411] |
Thu, 19 January 2006 21:51 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Serge,
The EODM folks are preparing to commit the code to CVS hopefully next
week some time, but the Chinese New Year holidays will delay preparing
the builds, which likely won't be available until Feb 17 (i.e., the M5
time frame). I'm glad to see the interest in this. ;-)
Serge Fantino wrote:
> Sadly I can't see any announce of availibility for EODM...
> Christmas is gone for a while now, and Santa didn't bring a relase...
>
> Serge.
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs
>> to be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
>>
>>
>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
>>> the only orphan left in emft.
>>>
>>> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
>>> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
>>> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
>>> under the new top-level modeling project.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gordon,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level
>>>> modeling project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was
>>>> going to suggest adding the OWL metamodel to these supported
>>>> technologies. Do you have an opinion on this?
>>>>
>>>> I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its
>>>> arrival for over 6 months...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dave Carlson
>>>>
>>>> "Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>>> news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Serge,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's
>>>>> team on provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #21928 is a reply to message #14411] |
Fri, 10 February 2006 08:57 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: gordon.xxx.com
All EODM team members came back from Chinese New Year vacation. Now EODM
source code is in CVS, and Nick is helping to produce build.
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #22149 is a reply to message #21928] |
Tue, 14 February 2006 15:54 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: codeslave.ca.ibm.com
The first Nightly builds are now being produced. They are for the moment
internal-only, but once the JUnit tests are completed, there will most
likely be first Integration build this Thursday.
Watch for the "[Announce]" post to follow, as with the other EMFT
subprojects.
Cheers,
Nick
Gordon wrote:
> All EODM team members came back from Chinese New Year vacation. Now EODM
> source code is in CVS, and Nick is helping to produce build.
>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #561561 is a reply to message #4359] |
Sun, 27 November 2005 19:58 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33136
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Serge,
The code is being reviewed by the Eclipse.org legal department and there
isn't a projected completion date.
Serge Fantino wrote:
> I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
> Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
> against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
>
> thx,
> Serge
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
| |
| Re: EODM release date [message #561600 is a reply to message #4497] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 21:26 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33136
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Serge,
I just got a note today that it's been approved. So now it's a matter
of committing the code to CVS and producing builds. There's a small
chance we could have it available before the new year...
Serge Fantino wrote:
> Is it a good news? Does that mean that the legal process may not succeed?
>
> S.
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> Serge,
>>
>> The code is being reviewed by the Eclipse.org legal department and
>> there isn't a projected completion date.
>>
>>
>> Serge Fantino wrote:
>>
>>> I read that the EODM project will be part of EMFT.
>>> Does anybody know how it is going on? any release date? any update
>>> against the last EMF/GEF revision? is the code will be available?
>>>
>>> thx,
>>> Serge
>>
>>
>>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
| | | | |
| Re: EODM release date [message #562977 is a reply to message #9907] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 16:58 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33136
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020606070706010805070009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave,
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.
Dave Carlson wrote:
>Gordon,
>
>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>opinion on this?
>
>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>over 6 months...
>
>Thanks,
> Dave Carlson
>
>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>
>>Serge,
>>
>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--------------020606070706010805070009
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dave,<br>
<br>
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------020606070706010805070009--
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #563006 is a reply to message #12308] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 17:39 |
Dave Carlson
Messages: 402
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be the =
only orphan left in emft.
Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling project? =
I'd like to dial in for it.
Dave
"Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message =
news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
Dave,
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed =
under the new top-level modeling project.
Dave Carlson wrote:=20
Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling=20
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to =
suggest=20
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have =
an=20
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for =
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message=20
news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on=20
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an =
obvious=20
change, else EODM would be the only orphan left in emft.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is there any schedule for a creation =
review of the=20
new modeling project? I'd like to dial in for it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dave</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Ed Merks" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org">news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.ecli=
pse.org</A>...</DIV>Dave,<BR><BR>It's=20
merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed =
under the=20
new top-level modeling project.<BR><BR><BR>Dave Carlson wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmiddpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org =
type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling=20
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to =
suggest=20
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have =
an=20
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for =
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E =
href=3D"mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></A> wrote in message =
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340=
ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</A>...
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on=20
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=3D""><!---->
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C61B52.4F58B680--
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #563032 is a reply to message #12319] |
Tue, 17 January 2006 18:03 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33136
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000307060902030504040603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave,
No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs to
be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
Dave Carlson wrote:
> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
> the only orphan left in emft.
>
> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>
> Dave
>
> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
> Dave,
>
> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
> under the new top-level modeling project.
>
>
> Dave Carlson wrote:
>
>>Gordon,
>>
>>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>>opinion on this?
>>
>>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>>over 6 months...
>>
>>Thanks,
>> Dave Carlson
>>
>>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>
>>
>>>Serge,
>>>
>>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--------------000307060902030504040603
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dave,<br>
<br>
No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs
to be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middqja4m$tq1$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an
obvious change, else EODM would be the only orphan left in emft.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Is there any schedule for a creation
review of the new modeling project? I'd like to dial in for it.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Dave</font></div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div>"Ed Merks" <<a href="mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</a>>
wrote in message <a href="news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org">news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org</a>...</div>
Dave,<br>
<br>
It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed under
the new top-level modeling project.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dave Carlson wrote:
<blockquote cite="middpk3js$pc9$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Gordon,
I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
opinion on this?
I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
over 6 months...
Thanks,
Dave Carlson
"Gordon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Gordon@xxx.xx"><Gordon@xxx.xx></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org">news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Serge,
Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000307060902030504040603--
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #563374 is a reply to message #12328] |
Thu, 19 January 2006 21:41 |
Serge Fantino
Messages: 18
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Sadly I can't see any announce of availibility for EODM...
Christmas is gone for a while now, and Santa didn't bring a relase...
Serge.
Ed Merks wrote:
> Dave,
>
> No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs to
> be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
>
>
> Dave Carlson wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
>> the only orphan left in emft.
>>
>> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
>> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
>> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
>> Dave,
>>
>> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
>> under the new top-level modeling project.
>>
>>
>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>
>>>Gordon,
>>>
>>>I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level modeling
>>>project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was going to suggest
>>>adding the OWL metamodel to these supported technologies. Do you have an
>>>opinion on this?
>>>
>>>I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its arrival for
>>>over 6 months...
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>> Dave Carlson
>>>
>>>"Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>>news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Serge,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's team on
>>>>provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
| Re: EODM release date [message #563401 is a reply to message #14411] |
Thu, 19 January 2006 21:51 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33136
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Serge,
The EODM folks are preparing to commit the code to CVS hopefully next
week some time, but the Chinese New Year holidays will delay preparing
the builds, which likely won't be available until Feb 17 (i.e., the M5
time frame). I'm glad to see the interest in this. ;-)
Serge Fantino wrote:
> Sadly I can't see any announce of availibility for EODM...
> Christmas is gone for a while now, and Santa didn't bring a relase...
>
> Serge.
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> No, I'm not sure of the schedule. I think the proposal usually needs
>> to be public for about 6 weeks before a review can be held.
>>
>>
>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Ed. It did seem like an obvious change, else EODM would be
>>> the only orphan left in emft.
>>>
>>> Is there any schedule for a creation review of the new modeling
>>> project? I'd like to dial in for it.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
>>> message news:dqj7nj$ncv$2@utils.eclipse.org...
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> It's merely an oversight. Everything under EMFT will be subsumed
>>> under the new top-level modeling project.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Carlson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gordon,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the EODM is not mentioned in the new top-level
>>>> modeling project proposal. I think it would be a good fit and was
>>>> going to suggest adding the OWL metamodel to these supported
>>>> technologies. Do you have an opinion on this?
>>>>
>>>> I am also very interested in EODM and have been awaiting its
>>>> arrival for over 6 months...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dave Carlson
>>>>
>>>> "Gordon" <Gordon@xxx.xx> wrote in message
>>>> news:340ba85d3ab109eae9a6c8877632fdb9$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Serge,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your interest to EODM. My team is working with Ed's
>>>>> team on provisioning the CVS. Hopefully, you can see it soon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
| | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 18 20:13:42 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03754 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
