|
|
| Re: model reviews - as attachements? [message #486674 is a reply to message #486652] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 15:01  |
 Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2509
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Bugzilla would perhaps be a better alternative - with model revisions as
attachments. I.e. the same way as patches are discussed. We don't have
an entry in bugzilla yet though.
And yes, models will be in SVN so anyone can "muck about" :)
- henrik
Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Henrik Lindberg wrote on Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07
>> How/Where would you like to review models?
>> - attachments to posts in this newsgroup
>> - links to PDF files in SVN
>> - Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments,
>> etc.)
>
>
> As long as it is straightforward to know what version of the document
> has what comments, then that would work.
>
> You could put the PDF into SVN, and we could refer to the rev number for
> comments in this forum.
> When the documents change, the check-in comment should link to the
> pertinent discussions in the forum, and those discussions
> should be terminated with a post containing a message like
>
> "This discussion has been addressed in r2133"
> The models will be SVN for mucking about with too, right?
>
> cheers
> --oh
|
|
|
|
| Re: model reviews - as attachements? [message #571520 is a reply to message #571411] |
Fri, 18 September 2009 15:01 |
Henrik Lindberg
Messages: 2509
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Bugzilla would perhaps be a better alternative - with model revisions as
attachments. I.e. the same way as patches are discussed. We don't have
an entry in bugzilla yet though.
And yes, models will be in SVN so anyone can "muck about" :)
- henrik
Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Henrik Lindberg wrote on Fri, 18 September 2009 09:07
>> How/Where would you like to review models?
>> - attachments to posts in this newsgroup
>> - links to PDF files in SVN
>> - Checkout the diagrams from SVN (to also see all details, comments,
>> etc.)
>
>
> As long as it is straightforward to know what version of the document
> has what comments, then that would work.
>
> You could put the PDF into SVN, and we could refer to the rev number for
> comments in this forum.
> When the documents change, the check-in comment should link to the
> pertinent discussions in the forum, and those discussions
> should be terminated with a post containing a message like
>
> "This discussion has been addressed in r2133"
> The models will be SVN for mucking about with too, right?
>
> cheers
> --oh
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02169 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
