Home » Modeling » M2T (model-to-text transformation) » Galileo performance twice as slow?
| | | |
| Re: Galileo performance twice as slow? [message #480473 is a reply to message #480446] |
Mon, 17 August 2009 09:57   |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080903050000020501040100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sebastian Zarnekow schrieb:
> Hi Jos,
>
> that's kind of a suprise. Actually we thought that we incorporated
> some very good improvements that should speed up the execution of an
> Xpand based code generator by at least 30%.
>
> Can you provide a reproduceable example that demonstrates the observed
> slowdown?
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
hopefully this message will not be twice - I posted a hour before from
Community Forums
--
from my experiences performance was
* 30 - 50% better if only EMF is onvolved
* nearly the ame as before if UML2 + UML2 Profiles involved
but I noticed a slowdown of Xpand/Xtend builder (other topic)
--
ekke (ekkehard gentz)
independent software-architect
senior erp-consultant
eclipse | osgi | equinox | mdsd | oaw | emf | uml
max-josefs-platz 30, D-83022 rosenheim, germany
mailto:ekke@ekkes-corner.org
homepage (de): http://gentz-software.de
blog (en): http://ekkes-corner.org
twitter: @ekkescorner
skype: ekkes-corner
Steuer-Nr: 156/220/30931 FA Rosenheim, UST-ID: DE189929490
--------------080903050000020501040100
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Sebastian Zarnekow schrieb:
<blockquote cite="mid:h6b3il$npe$1@build.eclipse.org" type="cite">Hi
Jos,
<br>
<br>
that's kind of a suprise. Actually we thought that we incorporated some
very good improvements that should speed up the execution of an Xpand
based code generator by at least 30%.
<br>
<br>
Can you provide a reproduceable example that demonstrates the observed
slowdown?
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
Sebastian
<br>
</blockquote>
hopefully this message will not be twice - I posted a hour before from
Community Forums<br>
<br>
--<br>
from my experiences performance was<br>
<br>
* 30 - 50% better if only EMF is onvolved<br>
* nearly the ame as before if UML2 + UML2 Profiles involved<br>
<br>
but I noticed a slowdown of Xpand/Xtend builder (other topic)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;"> <font ,="" color="#808080"
face="Verdana, sans-serif"> <font size="4">ekke (ekkehard gentz)<br>
</font> <font size="3"> independent software-architect<br>
senior erp-consultant<br>
</font> <font size="2">eclipse | osgi | equinox | mdsd | oaw | emf |
uml<br>
max-josefs-platz 30, D-83022 rosenheim, germany<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ekke@ekkes-corner.org">mailto:ekke@ekkes-corner.org</a><br>
homepage (de): <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gentz-software.de">http://gentz-software.de</a><br>
blog (en): <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ekkes-corner.org">http://ekkes-corner.org</a><br>
twitter: @ekkescorner<br>
skype: ekkes-corner<br>
</font> <font size="1"> Steuer-Nr: 156/220/30931 FA Rosenheim, UST-ID:
DE189929490<br>
</font> </font> </p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--------------080903050000020501040100--
ekke
independent software architect
blog: http://ekkes-corner.org
twitter: @ekkescorner
|
|
| | | | | |
| Re: Galileo performance twice as slow? [message #480821 is a reply to message #480771] |
Tue, 18 August 2009 14:56 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080103030300030409090205
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
in my projects EMF M2M and Generation works fast (faster then 4.3.1)
but esp. UML - M2M is very slow (same as 4.3.1, but 20 minutes for
generation is much),
I hoped that M2T-Xpand was faster
perhaps I also run into the performance problem with Java Classes ?
workflow from domain-specific project calls cartridges in another
plug-in (workspace) project
I have to do some more performance tests later,
but if it helps to change a workflow component to use the
OSGIResourceLoader I could try it out,
but where and how to implement ?
ekke
Jos Warmer schrieb:
> Sebastian,
>
> I assume you refer to this piece of code:
>
> CachingResourceLoaderImpl crl = new CachingResourceLoaderImpl(new
> OsgiResourceLoader(
> Activator.PLUGIN_ID, // a plugin that has declared the required
> deps
> MWEPlugin.INSTANCE.getBaseURL(),
> RunWorkflows.class.getClassLoader())); // a class from this plugin
> ResourceLoaderFactory.setCurrentThreadResourceLoader(crl);
>
> I am not sure where I should put this code. I tried to put it into an
> Activator class . First of all, there is no three-argument
> constructor for OsgiResourceLoader, so I removed the second argument.
>
> However, it does not seem to work. At least I see no difference in
> performance. Can you explain where to put this code?
>
> Jos
>
--
ekke (ekkehard gentz)
independent software-architect
senior erp-consultant
eclipse | osgi | equinox | mdsd | oaw | emf | uml
max-josefs-platz 30, D-83022 rosenheim, germany
mailto:ekke@ekkes-corner.org
homepage (de): http://gentz-software.de
blog (en): http://ekkes-corner.org
twitter: @ekkescorner
skype: ekkes-corner
Steuer-Nr: 156/220/30931 FA Rosenheim, UST-ID: DE189929490
--------------080103030300030409090205
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
in my
ekke
independent software architect
blog: http://ekkes-corner.org
twitter: @ekkescorner
|
|
|
| Re: Galileo performance twice as slow? [message #480900 is a reply to message #480771] |
Tue, 18 August 2009 19:21 |
 Sebastian Zarnekow
Messages: 3118
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Jos,
how do you start your generator?
You are right, the third param was removed after the last code review.
Somewhere in the context of your application, you'll need to configure
the ResourceLoaderFactory to use the caching resource loader instead of
the default implemenation. Doing this in the activator of your plugin
should work - at least in theory. Do you launch the generator in a job?
This would spawn an own thread and thereby ignore the current thread
resource loader. This raises the initial question: How do you start your
generator?
Regards,
Sebastian
--
Need professional support for Eclipse Modeling?
Go visit: http://xtext.itemis.com
Am 18.08.09 14:44, schrieb Jos Warmer:
> Sebastian,
>
> I assume you refer to this piece of code:
>
> CachingResourceLoaderImpl crl = new CachingResourceLoaderImpl(new
> OsgiResourceLoader(
> Activator.PLUGIN_ID, // a plugin that has declared the required deps
> MWEPlugin.INSTANCE.getBaseURL(), RunWorkflows.class.getClassLoader()));
> // a class from this plugin
> ResourceLoaderFactory.setCurrentThreadResourceLoader(crl);
>
> I am not sure where I should put this code. I tried to put it into an
> Activator class . First of all, there is no three-argument constructor
> for OsgiResourceLoader, so I removed the second argument.
>
> However, it does not seem to work. At least I see no difference in
> performance. Can you explain where to put this code?
>
> Jos
>
|
|
|
| Re: Galileo performance twice as slow? [message #481502 is a reply to message #480900] |
Fri, 21 August 2009 10:14 |
Jos Warmer
Messages: 66
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Sebastian,
We have quite a lot of plugins running. There are two that are involved in starting the workflow.
The workflow is initiated through a Builder, which is part of the plugin org.mod4j,.eclipse.
The Builder calls a method fro a second plugin org.mod4j.common.
From this method the MWE workflowrunner is started as follows:
WorkflowRunner runner = new WorkflowRunner();
if (!runner.run(wfFile, new NullProgressMonitor(), properties, slotContents)) {
logger.error("------- ERROR(S) detected while running workflow : [" + wfFile + "] ");
throw new Mod4jWorkflowException("ERROR(S) detected while running workflow :" + wfFile);
}
The call to runner.run(...) is the one taking up all the time.
I have tried to put the code to configure the caching recource loader in the Activator of both the org.mod4j.eclipse and the org.mod4j.common plugin. There is no observable difference in performance.
The exact code that I added in the Activator in e.g org.mod4j.common is:
CachingResourceLoaderImpl crl = new CachingResourceLoaderImpl(new
OsgiResourceLoader(
Activator.PLUGIN_ID, // The Activator in which this code resides
FileTrack.class.getClassLoader() // FileTrack is a class inside org.modj.common
)
); // a class from this plugin
ResourceLoaderFactory.setCurrentThreadResourceLoader(crl);
Any ideas?
Jos,
[Updated on: Fri, 21 August 2009 10:30] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
| Re: Galileo performance twice as slow? [message #481509 is a reply to message #481502] |
Fri, 21 August 2009 10:43 |
Sebastian Zarnekow
Messages: 3118
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Jos,
please try to put the code directly before the "runner.run". Furthermore
please ensure that the referenced templates and extensions are directly
on the classpath of the plugin that contains the FileTrack-class or at
least registered via an explicit buddy policy. Otherwise the classloader
is very slow when it comes to resolution of types etc.
Hope that helps,
Sebastian
--
Need professional support for Eclipse Modeling?
Go visit: http://xtext.itemis.com
Am 21.08.09 12:14, schrieb Jos Warmer:
> Sebastian,
>
> We have quite a lot of plugins running. There are two that are involved
> in starting the workflow.
>
> The workflow is initiated through a Builder, which is part of the plugin
> org.mod4j,.eclipse.
> The Builder calls a method fro a second plugin org.mod4j.common.
> From this method the MWE workflowrunner is started as follows:
>
> WorkflowRunner runner = new WorkflowRunner();
>
> if (!runner.run(wfFile, new NullProgressMonitor(), properties,
> slotContents)) {
> logger.error("------- ERROR(S) detected while running workflow : [" +
> wfFile + "] ");
> throw new Mod4jWorkflowException("ERROR(S) detected while running
> workflow :" + wfFile);
> }
>
> The call to runner.run(...) is the one taking up all the time. I have
> tried to put the code to configure the caching recource loader in the
> Activator of both the org.mod4j.eclipse and the org.mod4j.common plugin.
> There is no observable difference in performance.
>
> The exact code that I added in the Activator in e.g org.mod4j.common is:
>
> CachingResourceLoaderImpl crl = new CachingResourceLoaderImpl(new
> OsgiResourceLoader(
> Activator.PLUGIN_ID, // The Activator in which this code resides
> FileTrack.class.getClassLoader() // FileTrack is a class inside
> org.modj.common
> )
> ); // a class from this plugin
>
> ResourceLoaderFactory.setCurrentThreadResourceLoader(crl);
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Jos,
|
|
| | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 20 00:27:27 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05766 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
