Eclipse Community Forums: UML2 » UML Profiles

Search

Help

Login

Home » Modeling » UML2 » UML Profiles

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Switch to threaded view of this topic

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

UML Profiles [message #478383]

Tue, 12 May 2009 14:59

Samuel Mising name is currently offline

Samuel Mising name

Friend

Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009

Member

Hi,

Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
profile.
For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two 'connector ends'.
Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two stereotypes extending a
connector end in a stereotype extending a connector), or is there another
way to express this relation?

Cheers,

Samuel

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML Profiles [message #478417 is a reply to message #478383]

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:58

james bruck is currently offline

Friend

Messages: 1724
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Samuel,

Perhaps an OCL may be the best way to express such constraints?

- James.

"Samuel " <samuel.esposito@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea7215130db27df4f7b2e45a39546c1a$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
> profile. For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two
> 'connector ends'. Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two
> stereotypes extending a connector end in a stereotype extending a
> connector), or is there another way to express this relation?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Samuel
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML Profiles [message #478461 is a reply to message #478417]

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:16

Samuel Mising name is currently offline

Samuel Mising name

Friend

Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009

Member

Thanks for your reply James! I will go with the OCL constraints then.

Samuel

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML Profiles [message #627602 is a reply to message #478383]

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:58

james bruck is currently offline

Friend

Messages: 1724
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Samuel,

Perhaps an OCL may be the best way to express such constraints?

- James.

"Samuel " <samuel.esposito@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea7215130db27df4f7b2e45a39546c1a$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm trying to express relations between UML elements in a
> profile. For example I want to define that a 'connector' owns two
> 'connector ends'. Do I do this using nested stereotypes (nesting two
> stereotypes extending a connector end in a stereotype extending a
> connector), or is there another way to express this relation?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Samuel
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML Profiles [message #627636 is a reply to message #478417]

Tue, 26 May 2009 18:16

Samuel Mising name is currently offline

Samuel Mising name

Friend

Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009

Member

Thanks for your reply James! I will go with the OCL constraints then.

Samuel

Report message to a moderator

Switch to threaded view of this topic

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Previous Topic:	standard primitive types available?
Next Topic:	Default value of EBooleanObject

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 21:09:53 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02773 seconds

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top