| derived tagged value in a stereotype. [message #473108] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 09:03  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: firstname.name.gmail.com
Hello,
According to UML OMG specification, i may define a stereotype having a derived
tag value.
This feature seems to be useful in some case but I am wondering how could be it
supported/used. I think that one of the most proper way should be to define a
OCL expression to compute the derived value (the UML specification mostly
defines derived expression in english) and maybe use it as constraint.
But, if we consider this mechanism, I really don't know how this value may be
"in live" computed when a profile is applied.
Does someone has any ideas?
--
F. Lagarde
|
|
|
|
| Re: derived tagged value in a stereotype. [message #473124 is a reply to message #473117] |
Fri, 08 June 2007 08:32  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: firstname.name.gmail.com
In the last post, on 06/07 about 06h, "James" (James Bruck) wrote:
James> 1. Use static profile definition. That is, generate code from
James> your profile [...] There is support for this in the 2.1 release.
thanks for your reply.
I "discovered" this feature, but I have not yet understood how use this
mechanism.
I guess that since profiles are dynamics and can't affect the UML metamodel,
static profile result in a kind of "plugin" in addition to the classic profile
definition. This plugin could be a charge of useful things... but I do not know
what..
Is there any tutorial or example to provide helps.
--
F. Lagarde
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: derived tagged value in a stereotype. [message #619912 is a reply to message #473117] |
Fri, 08 June 2007 08:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: firstname.name.gmail.com
In the last post, on 06/07 about 06h, "James" (James Bruck) wrote:
James> 1. Use static profile definition. That is, generate code from
James> your profile [...] There is support for this in the 2.1 release.
thanks for your reply.
I "discovered" this feature, but I have not yet understood how use this
mechanism.
I guess that since profiles are dynamics and can't affect the UML metamodel,
static profile result in a kind of "plugin" in addition to the classic profile
definition. This plugin could be a charge of useful things... but I do not know
what..
Is there any tutorial or example to provide helps.
--
F. Lagarde
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03410 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
