| Re: jet editor java syntax coloring [message #45295] |
Sat, 10 May 2008 19:17  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Gary,
It's best to ask about it on the M2T newsgroup, which I've added to the
"to" list of the reply...
I think the containing project needs to have codegen.ecore on the classpath.
gary thompson wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I have just installed the jet editor from the emft in M7 and am
> pleasantly delighted with the highlighting of the code it gives me.
> However, it only syntax colors the jet code and not the embedded java.
> However,there seems to be a menu item 'set non-jet text content
> colorer...' but this brings up an empty list.... does anyone have
> further suggestion (information on using and configuring the editor
> seems to be sparse on the ground'
>
> Also, as an aside, I am trying to edit the ecore Class.javajet file
> and various included files with the jet editor and it is complaining
> that it can't identify the ecore genModel classes. How can I add these
> to the list of classes it understands (note I am still building the
> java source files with the emf jet installation)
>
> regards
> gary
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: jet editor java syntax coloring [message #45411 is a reply to message #45384] |
Mon, 12 May 2008 20:36  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Gary,
Comments below.
gary thompson wrote:
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>
>> It's best to ask about it on the M2T newsgroup, which I've added to
>> the "to" list of the reply...
>
>
> Dear Ed
>
> Many thanks for (re)directing me to the right place. Just as an aside
> and as a newbie trying to work out what goes with what and how the
> whole m2t, emft, emf, m2t etc acronym soup holds together is quite
> confusing.
It's wholesome and nourishing soup! :-P Don't worry, if you go to the
wrong place, I'll notice and send you to the right one, so it's not a
problem.
> For example just one question (there are more) there seems to be jet
> and jet2 but will jet2 replace jet in the emf framework?
That's the idea, yes, but we've not had time to do that work since to a
large extent it should be a big no-op.
>
> regards
> gary
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03136 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
