Home » Eclipse Projects » Dali » persistence.xml management
|
Re: persistence.xml management [message #433723 is a reply to message #433720] |
Thu, 13 April 2006 19:03 |
Paul Fullbright Messages: 201 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Kevin,
Right now our intended support for M2 will is summarized by the following
bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136725
After that functionality is added, the following bugs are going to be
addressed (in the order shown):
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136726
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=130580
If you have any use cases you'd like for us to capture or any
functionality that hasn't been described as of yet, please feel free to
post here, add to any of these bugs, or create new ones. We would
*greatly* appreciate the feedback of people who are going to be using this
tool. (And obviously we're not necessarily ahead of you, as two of these
bugs were just created. We're still ramping up our public visibility.)
Thanks,
- Paul
Kevin wrote:
> Hi,
> Can I get a few more words on what the "management of persistence.xml"
> feature in M2 will include? I was thinking of writing a bugzilla
> enhancement report for some ideas that I was having regarding the
> generation and management of xml configuration files. But, maybe you are
> already one step ahead of me. If you could elaborate a bit or point me at
> more detailed documentation, it would be appreciated.
> Thank you,
> Kevin
|
|
| | |
Re: persistence.xml management [message #433937 is a reply to message #433934] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:21 |
Kevin Sutter Messages: 106 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Paul,
I guess I was referring more to the orm.xml file, wasn't I? I was just
clumping the two xml files together. So, the orm.xml file management is
not part of the 0.5 release, huh? Do you know if the generation of the
orm.xml based on the annotated Entities considered one of the requirements
for a future release?
Thanks,
Kevin
Paul Fullbright wrote:
> Kevin,
> Are you speaking of the orm.xml file (though it may have many different
> names) that replicates, for the most part, all the information captured in
> the annotations? Or the persistence.xml file (and it *must* have that
> name) that describes to the persistence provider runtime where to find all
> the persistence information (classes, jars, orm.xml files) that it will
> use?
> The enhancements that I entered all deal with the latter. As for the
> former, orm.xml support has not been targeted for our 0.5 release.
|
|
|
Re: persistence.xml management [message #433938 is a reply to message #433937] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:39 |
Paul Fullbright Messages: 201 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Kevin,
Actually, the requirements post-0.5 haven't been solidified (or even
liquefied) yet, but an enhancement request, especially one with detailed
information, will do nothing but help your request make the list.
Thanks for input!
- Paul
Kevin wrote:
> Paul,
> I guess I was referring more to the orm.xml file, wasn't I? I was just
> clumping the two xml files together. So, the orm.xml file management is
> not part of the 0.5 release, huh? Do you know if the generation of the
> orm.xml based on the annotated Entities considered one of the requirements
> for a future release?
> Thanks,
> Kevin
|
|
| |
Re: persistence.xml management [message #581865 is a reply to message #433720] |
Thu, 13 April 2006 19:03 |
Paul Fullbright Messages: 201 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Kevin,
Right now our intended support for M2 will is summarized by the following
bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136725
After that functionality is added, the following bugs are going to be
addressed (in the order shown):
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=136726
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=130580
If you have any use cases you'd like for us to capture or any
functionality that hasn't been described as of yet, please feel free to
post here, add to any of these bugs, or create new ones. We would
*greatly* appreciate the feedback of people who are going to be using this
tool. (And obviously we're not necessarily ahead of you, as two of these
bugs were just created. We're still ramping up our public visibility.)
Thanks,
- Paul
Kevin wrote:
> Hi,
> Can I get a few more words on what the "management of persistence.xml"
> feature in M2 will include? I was thinking of writing a bugzilla
> enhancement report for some ideas that I was having regarding the
> generation and management of xml configuration files. But, maybe you are
> already one step ahead of me. If you could elaborate a bit or point me at
> more detailed documentation, it would be appreciated.
> Thank you,
> Kevin
|
|
| | |
Re: persistence.xml management [message #584917 is a reply to message #433934] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:21 |
Kevin Sutter Messages: 106 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Paul,
I guess I was referring more to the orm.xml file, wasn't I? I was just
clumping the two xml files together. So, the orm.xml file management is
not part of the 0.5 release, huh? Do you know if the generation of the
orm.xml based on the annotated Entities considered one of the requirements
for a future release?
Thanks,
Kevin
Paul Fullbright wrote:
> Kevin,
> Are you speaking of the orm.xml file (though it may have many different
> names) that replicates, for the most part, all the information captured in
> the annotations? Or the persistence.xml file (and it *must* have that
> name) that describes to the persistence provider runtime where to find all
> the persistence information (classes, jars, orm.xml files) that it will
> use?
> The enhancements that I entered all deal with the latter. As for the
> former, orm.xml support has not been targeted for our 0.5 release.
|
|
|
Re: persistence.xml management [message #584930 is a reply to message #433937] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:39 |
Paul Fullbright Messages: 201 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Kevin,
Actually, the requirements post-0.5 haven't been solidified (or even
liquefied) yet, but an enhancement request, especially one with detailed
information, will do nothing but help your request make the list.
Thanks for input!
- Paul
Kevin wrote:
> Paul,
> I guess I was referring more to the orm.xml file, wasn't I? I was just
> clumping the two xml files together. So, the orm.xml file management is
> not part of the 0.5 release, huh? Do you know if the generation of the
> orm.xml based on the annotated Entities considered one of the requirements
> for a future release?
> Thanks,
> Kevin
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 23:57:41 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03523 seconds
|