|
| Re: [CDO]: What's the general behaviour of Defs when attributes are changed? [message #426302 is a reply to message #426289] |
Mon, 22 December 2008 17:40  |
|
André,
I would also prefer approach 2, at least initially. It is way simpler
and seems to cover the majority of use cases.
Approach 1 has more implications than obvious at a first glance: for
instance, the connector of a session could stay the same but its
dependencies could change (i.e. transitive dependencies)...
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
André Dietisheim schrieb:
> Hi Eike, Hi all!
>
> I tied the packages attribute of the definition to its inner instance
> in CDOPackageManagerDef (packages added to the def are passed to the
> CDOPackageRegistry instance if it's already running). I now wonder
> what's the general idea behind this. What wold this be applied to for
> ex. CDOSession?
>
> 1) Would the CDOSession be deactivated and restarted with the new
> connector is changed?
>
> 2) Or would it only matter as soon as the def is requested to deliver
> its instance? it would deactivate the current instance, create a new
> one and activate it?
>
> I opt for the second approach.
> To my opinion I'd like to stick to the 2nd approach in general. I
> believe that stick to the same behaviour is what makes an API well
> formed, it acts the way you are used to.
>
> Any ideas on this?
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01521 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
