Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor
[CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422261] Wed, 27 August 2008 16:13 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: andras.okros.optxware.com

Hi group,

I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO into
a standalone EMF editor?

I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a separate xml
file, with them I can start/use the integrated CDOeditor, but instead I
would like to create a connecting layer (or sg) between the CDO
repository handling and a normal EMF editor. Is there any solution,
which allows the original (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully)
intact?
Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?

Thanks a lot in advance
András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422272 is a reply to message #422261] Thu, 28 August 2008 09:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi András,

I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities and
ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides a
CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you can
have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).

Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore generated
editor would work by itself without enhancement with CDOResources
(haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor code, I suspect I
would be not possible right now. We discussed this recently, and it
would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet and URIHandler.

HTH,
Víctor.

András Ökrös escribió:
> Hi group,
>
> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO into
> a standalone EMF editor?
>
> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a separate xml
> file, with them I can start/use the integrated CDOeditor, but instead I
> would like to create a connecting layer (or sg) between the CDO
> repository handling and a normal EMF editor. Is there any solution,
> which allows the original (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully)
> intact?
> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance
> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422274 is a reply to message #422272] Thu, 28 August 2008 10:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eike Stepper is currently offline Eike StepperFriend
Messages: 6483
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hey guys,

Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched Bugzilla
but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right? Maybe it's a
good idea to broaden the audience by making the code available through
Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable feedback much earlier.

Cheers
/Eike


Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
> Hi András,
>
> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities and
> ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides a
> CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you can
> have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>
> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore generated
> editor would work by itself without enhancement with CDOResources
> (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor code, I suspect
> I would be not possible right now. We discussed this recently, and it
> would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>
> HTH,
> Víctor.
>
> András Ökrös escribió:
>> Hi group,
>>
>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>
>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a separate
>> xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated CDOeditor, but
>> instead I would like to create a connecting layer (or sg) between the
>> CDO repository handling and a normal EMF editor. Is there any
>> solution, which allows the original (generated) EMF editor to be
>> nearly (or fully) intact?
>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>
>> Thanks a lot in advance
>> András


Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422275 is a reply to message #422274] Thu, 28 August 2008 10:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi Eike,

yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed to
refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.

Regards,
ViK.

Eike Stepper escribió:
> Hey guys,
>
> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched Bugzilla
> but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right? Maybe it's a
> good idea to broaden the audience by making the code available through
> Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable feedback much earlier.
>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
>
> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>> Hi András,
>>
>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities and
>> ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides a
>> CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you can
>> have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
>> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
>> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
>> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
>> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>
>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore generated
>> editor would work by itself without enhancement with CDOResources
>> (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor code, I suspect
>> I would be not possible right now. We discussed this recently, and it
>> would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Víctor.
>>
>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>> Hi group,
>>>
>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>
>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a separate
>>> xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated CDOeditor, but
>>> instead I would like to create a connecting layer (or sg) between the
>>> CDO repository handling and a normal EMF editor. Is there any
>>> solution, which allows the original (generated) EMF editor to be
>>> nearly (or fully) intact?
>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422277 is a reply to message #422275] Thu, 28 August 2008 11:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eike Stepper is currently offline Eike StepperFriend
Messages: 6483
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
> Hi Eike,
>
> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed to
> refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
If you're just changing the templates from JET2 to JET1 this should have
no major impact on the generated artifacts. So if András is willing to
preview the editor you could consider his feedback earlier if you file a
Bugzilla now. Personally I don't mind because I won't be able to look at
this before the next week.

Cheers
/Eike


>
> Regards,
> ViK.
>
> Eike Stepper escribió:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>> feedback much earlier.
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>>
>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>> Hi András,
>>>
>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides
>>> a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you
>>> can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
>>> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
>>> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
>>> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
>>> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>
>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed this
>>> recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet
>>> and URIHandler.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Víctor.
>>>
>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>> Hi group,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>>>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>
>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>> András


Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422278 is a reply to message #422277] Thu, 28 August 2008 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Eike Stepper escribió:
> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>> Hi Eike,
>>
>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
>> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
>> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed to
>> refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
> If you're just changing the templates from JET2 to JET1 this should have
> no major impact on the generated artifacts. So if András is willing to
> preview the editor you could consider his feedback earlier if you file a
> Bugzilla now. Personally I don't mind because I won't be able to look at
> this before the next week.

Ok, I'll do my best.

Cheers.
Victor.

>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> ViK.
>>
>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>>
>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>> Hi András,
>>>>
>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides
>>>> a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you
>>>> can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
>>>> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
>>>> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
>>>> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
>>>> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>
>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed this
>>>> recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet
>>>> and URIHandler.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Víctor.
>>>>
>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>>>>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>
>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422289 is a reply to message #422275] Thu, 28 August 2008 15:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: andras.okros.optxware.com

Hello Victor, Eike,

Thanks for the fast replies!
The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give some
feedback about it.

Best regards,
András

Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
> Hi Eike,
>
> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed to
> refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>
> Regards,
> ViK.
>
> Eike Stepper escribió:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>> feedback much earlier.
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>>
>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>> Hi András,
>>>
>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides a
>>> CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you
>>> can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
>>> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
>>> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
>>> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
>>> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>
>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed this
>>> recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet and
>>> URIHandler.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Víctor.
>>>
>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>> Hi group,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>>>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>
>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a separate
>>>> xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated CDOeditor, but
>>>> instead I would like to create a connecting layer (or sg) between
>>>> the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF editor. Is there any
>>>> solution, which allows the original (generated) EMF editor to be
>>>> nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422342 is a reply to message #422289] Mon, 01 September 2008 14:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi everyone,

the bugzilla has been raised:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245836

Awaiting comments!

Víctor.

András Ökrös escribió:
> Hello Victor, Eike,
>
> Thanks for the fast replies!
> The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give some
> feedback about it.
>
> Best regards,
> András
>
> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>> Hi Eike,
>>
>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
>> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
>> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed to
>> refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>>
>> Regards,
>> ViK.
>>
>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>>
>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>> Hi András,
>>>>
>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides
>>>> a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that you
>>>> can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities a
>>>> CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I proposed
>>>> this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be willing to
>>>> evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would take me some
>>>> time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>
>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed this
>>>> recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's ResourceSet
>>>> and URIHandler.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Víctor.
>>>>
>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate CDO
>>>>> into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>
>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422498 is a reply to message #422342] Sun, 07 September 2008 19:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mark Geib is currently offline Mark GeibFriend
Messages: 432
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Just posted a comment to bugzilla.

I would like to try the generator but I can't see to make it do anything.

I always get a error that says "The chosen operation is not currently
available."


Víctor Roldán Betancort wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the bugzilla has been raised:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245836
>
> Awaiting comments!
>
> Víctor.
>
> András Ökrös escribió:
>> Hello Victor, Eike,
>>
>> Thanks for the fast replies!
>> The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give some
>> feedback about it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> András
>>
>> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>>> Hi Eike,
>>>
>>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
>>> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
>>> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed
>>> to refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> ViK.
>>>
>>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> /Eike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>>> Hi András,
>>>>>
>>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides
>>>>> a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that
>>>>> you can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities
>>>>> a CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I
>>>>> proposed this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be
>>>>> willing to evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would
>>>>> take me some time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed
>>>>> this recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's
>>>>> ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>> Víctor.
>>>>>
>>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate
>>>>>> CDO into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422511 is a reply to message #422498] Mon, 08 September 2008 08:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Mark,

comments in bugzilla :)

Cheers,
ViK

Mark Geib escribió:
> Just posted a comment to bugzilla.
>
> I would like to try the generator but I can't see to make it do anything.
>
> I always get a error that says "The chosen operation is not currently
> available."
>
>
> Víctor Roldán Betancort wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> the bugzilla has been raised:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245836
>>
>> Awaiting comments!
>>
>> Víctor.
>>
>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>> Hello Victor, Eike,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the fast replies!
>>> The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give
>>> some feedback about it.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> András
>>>
>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>>>> Hi Eike,
>>>>
>>>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's
>>>> fine for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still
>>>> using JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll
>>>> proceed to refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> ViK.
>>>>
>>>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> /Eike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi András,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator
>>>>>> provides a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this
>>>>>> means, that you can have your customized editor, extended with the
>>>>>> capabilities a CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already
>>>>>> working and I proposed this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike
>>>>>> seems to be willing to evaluate it, but asked me to do some
>>>>>> changes that would take me some time (more precisely, shifting
>>>>>> from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed
>>>>>> this recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's
>>>>>> ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>> Víctor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate
>>>>>>> CDO into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422590 is a reply to message #422342] Wed, 10 September 2008 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: andras.okros.optxware.com

Hello Victor,

Thanks for the generator!
We tried it out this week, and it works fine. If some glitch turns out
I'll let you know :).

Best regards,
András

Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the bugzilla has been raised:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245836
>
> Awaiting comments!
>
> Víctor.
>
> András Ökrös escribió:
>> Hello Victor, Eike,
>>
>> Thanks for the fast replies!
>> The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give some
>> feedback about it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> András
>>
>> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>>> Hi Eike,
>>>
>>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's fine
>>> for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still using
>>> JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll proceed
>>> to refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> ViK.
>>>
>>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> /Eike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>>> Hi András,
>>>>>
>>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator provides
>>>>> a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this means, that
>>>>> you can have your customized editor, extended with the capabilities
>>>>> a CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already working and I
>>>>> proposed this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike seems to be
>>>>> willing to evaluate it, but asked me to do some changes that would
>>>>> take me some time (more precisely, shifting from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed
>>>>> this recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's
>>>>> ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>> Víctor.
>>>>>
>>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate
>>>>>> CDO into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>>> András
Re: [CDO] Transparent CDO integration into generated EMF editor [message #422592 is a reply to message #422590] Wed, 10 September 2008 17:55 Go to previous message
Victor Roldan Betancort is currently offline Victor Roldan BetancortFriend
Messages: 524
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi András,

thank you very much for the feedback!
Feel free to raise any question/comments in the generator's bugzilla.

Cheers,
ViK.

András Ökrös escribió:
> Hello Victor,
>
> Thanks for the generator!
> We tried it out this week, and it works fine. If some glitch turns out
> I'll let you know :).
>
> Best regards,
> András
>
> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> the bugzilla has been raised:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245836
>>
>> Awaiting comments!
>>
>> Víctor.
>>
>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>> Hello Victor, Eike,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the fast replies!
>>> The bugzilla would be great, at least we can try it out, and give
>>> some feedback about it.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> András
>>>
>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort írta:
>>>> Hi Eike,
>>>>
>>>> yes, I have only sent it to you privately, no bugzilla yet. It's
>>>> fine for me to submit the generator, but you have to know it's still
>>>> using JET2 instead of JET1. If that's still ok for you, then I'll
>>>> proceed to refactor the project and then commit it to a bugzilla.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> ViK.
>>>>
>>>> Eike Stepper escribió:
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> Vik, I was in hope that you would answer this question because I'm
>>>>> currently over busy with some presentations. I already searched
>>>>> Bugzilla but I think you only sent the code to me privately, right?
>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to broaden the audience by making the code
>>>>> available through Bugzilla. This way we could receive valuable
>>>>> feedback much earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> /Eike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Víctor Roldán Betancort schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi András,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I went through the same problem. I evaluated several possibilities
>>>>>> and ended up doing my own editor generator. This generator
>>>>>> provides a CDO-Ready extension of generated EMF Editors, this
>>>>>> means, that you can have your customized editor, extended with the
>>>>>> capabilities a CDOResource needs to be managed. It's already
>>>>>> working and I proposed this it to be donated to CDO project. Eike
>>>>>> seems to be willing to evaluate it, but asked me to do some
>>>>>> changes that would take me some time (more precisely, shifting
>>>>>> from JET2 to JET1).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding other alternatives, I'm not sure if a Sample Ecore
>>>>>> generated editor would work by itself without enhancement with
>>>>>> CDOResources (haven't tried, though), but when I look at CDOEditor
>>>>>> code, I suspect I would be not possible right now. We discussed
>>>>>> this recently, and it would need some work regarding EMF's
>>>>>> ResourceSet and URIHandler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>> Víctor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> András Ökrös escribió:
>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to ask, which is the easiest solution to integrate
>>>>>>> CDO into a standalone EMF editor?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I store the CDO properties (repository, location, etc) in a
>>>>>>> separate xml file, with them I can start/use the integrated
>>>>>>> CDOeditor, but instead I would like to create a connecting layer
>>>>>>> (or sg) between the CDO repository handling and a normal EMF
>>>>>>> editor. Is there any solution, which allows the original
>>>>>>> (generated) EMF editor to be nearly (or fully) intact?
>>>>>>> Can you suggest what built-in CDO classes should I use?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance
>>>>>>> András
Previous Topic:[Teneo] 0..* associations, how to fetch parent from child
Next Topic:XSD to ecore
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Feb 26 08:25:30 GMT 2020

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.15491 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top