Eclipse Community Forums: TMF (Xtext) » Alternatives can never be matched

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » TMF (Xtext) » Alternatives can never be matched

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Alternatives can never be matched [message #1838868]

Sun, 07 March 2021 14:40

John Henbergs

Messages: 214
Registered: October 2020

Senior Member

Hi all,

I am having some issues with Xtext.

Lets say that I have the following rules.

Node:
Circle | Square | Triangle

Circle:
Name = ID ;

Square:
Name = ID ;

Triangle:
Name=ID

I get an error saying:
Decision can match input such as "RULE_ID" using multiple alternatives: 1, 2, 3. Alternatives 2,3 can never be matched.

I understand why this happens. being that the name is ID in all of them while creating a node there will be no way to know if it is a circle, square or triangle.

I know that I can add a keyword before the name to distinct them, but I do not want to do that because I have the following statement:

circle+=Circle ("," circle+=Circle)* ";" )*

And if I add a keyword I will get:
Circle c1;
Circle c2;

while I want

Circle c1, c2;

And I also do not want to change ID.

Any way around this?

Many thanks!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Alternatives can never be matched [message #1838870 is a reply to message #1838868]

Sun, 07 March 2021 15:32

Christian Dietrich

Messages: 14263
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

you can either move the keyword or

CircleList: "Circle" circles+=Circle (","circles+=Circle)*;
Circle: name=ID

use m2m / IDerivedStateComputer http://xtextcasts.org/episodes/18-model-optimization

Need professional support for Xtext, Xpand, EMF?
Go to: https://www.itemis.com/en/it-services/methods-and-tools/xtext
Twitter : @chrdietrich
Blog : https://www.dietrich-it.de

Report message to a moderator

Re: Alternatives can never be matched [message #1838871 is a reply to message #1838868]

Sun, 07 March 2021 15:32

Ed Willink

Messages: 7468
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

HI

What you have programmed has excatly zero difference between Circl/Triangle/Square so you cannot expect Xtext to telepathically decide which you mean.

Consider something more familiar such as Java where you have PackageName/ClassName/FieldName with a declaration that clarifies the intent of the name so that subsequent usage does not confuse Package and Field references.

You need to introduce shape declarations such as

CircleDef := 'Circle' ID (',' ID)*;
SquareDef := 'Square' ID (',' ID)*;

ShapeDef := CircleDef | SquareDef;

circle += CircleDef ...

Regards

Ed Willink

Report message to a moderator

Re: Alternatives can never be matched [message #1838874 is a reply to message #1838871]

Sun, 07 March 2021 17:09

John Henbergs

Messages: 214
Registered: October 2020

Senior Member

Hi Ed,

Thank you for your answer. However, when I try your approach, CircleDef is in light gray, and it is not reachable. So when I try to write the grammar, circle will not show up at all.

If I change it to
CircleDef := 'Circle' name=ID (',' name=ID)*;

It fixes that, but then I get:
This assignment will probably overwrite the previously assigned value of name, so I cannot do that either.

Any other option?

Thanks!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Alternatives can never be matched [message #1838875 is a reply to message #1838874]

Sun, 07 March 2021 18:38

Ed Willink

Messages: 7468
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi

LIght gray means not referenced.

I suggest you follow an Xtext tutorial so that you learn the basic concepts before you ask for them all to be explained .

Regards

Ed Willink

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Begginer on Xtext Validation
Next Topic:	Ambiguous grammar

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 24 03:48:12 GMT 2022

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter