|
|
Re: Arrows should mean dependency and not navigation association Papyrus [message #1806191 is a reply to message #1806184] |
Sun, 05 May 2019 18:29 |
|
Hi,
as the figure 11.29 and 11.30 of the UML 2.5.1 specification (https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF) shows, the arrows might be omitted if the association is navigable in both directions.
As a result both notations are allowed by the UML specification.
By the way, Visual Paradigm can also show the arrows as shown in the diagram attached.
One more detail:
The bullets in front of the arrows of the association shown as the Papyrus example by Eduardo denotes both ends of the association are owned by the classes associated.
In the Visual Paradigm example given the association ends are owned by the association itself.
Best regards,
Carsten
[Updated on: Sun, 05 May 2019 18:35] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01917 seconds