|
Re: Papyrus Java Code Generation [message #1777858 is a reply to message #1777756] |
Tue, 05 December 2017 12:17 |
|
Hi,
could you please have a look at the "Error Log" and tell us, if there are any exceptions? Can you also tell us, which version of Papyrus and software designer you use?
When you say, that "even if the java project is created ...", does it mean that the project gets created, but you don't see generated source code files inside?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Papyrus Java Code Generation [message #1778512 is a reply to message #1778443] |
Fri, 15 December 2017 13:24 |
|
There is currently no support for generating Hibernate/Spring in Papyrus SW designer - unless you volunteer doing it, it is extensible ;-). I'm not aware of a tool supporting this, but haven't really done an in-depth search.
|
|
|
Re: Papyrus Java Code Generation [message #1778556 is a reply to message #1778443] |
Sun, 17 December 2017 14:22 |
|
Hi Jan,
to experiment with MDA I would rather suggest building your own model to text transformer using Obeo Eclipse Acceleo (https://www.eclipse.org/acceleo/). While being not as powerful as XPand/XTend Obeo Eclipse Acceleo as an OMG M2T (http://www.omg.org/spec/MOFM2T/About-MOFM2T/) processor is IMHO easier to learn. If you experience serious limitations, you can either extend the Papyrus Java code generator or build your own custom generators with XPand/Xtext. Acceleo scripts tend to require more compute time to execute than XPand/Xtend generators. If the generator performance becomes an serious issue, then you can switch and reuse the transformation rules. In this case Acceleo has done a good job as a RAD (Rapid Application Development) tool ;-)
/pica
[Updated on: Sun, 17 December 2017 14:26] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03070 seconds