Eclipse Community Forums: Papyrus » No code generated for literals?

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » Papyrus » No code generated for literals?(C++ codegen question)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

No code generated for literals? [message #1764704]

Thu, 01 June 2017 13:47

Stephen Blackwell

Messages: 138
Registered: March 2014

Senior Member

I have a model that contains a package, myPkg, and inside that package there are several classes. All these classes need to reference a constant so I added a LiteralInteger, myLitInt to the package at the same level as the classes.

myPkg
->ClassA
->ClassB
->myLitInt

I want the generated (C++) package include file to look something like this:

Pkg_myPkg.h:

namespace myPkg {

#define myLitInt 42
...

or perhaps
const int myLitInt = 42;

but the generated code makes no mention of the Literal Integer at all.

Is this a limitation of the code generator? If so, is there a workaround? I have tried adding various things to the Include profile but they end up outside the myPkg namespace.

Thanks,
Steve

Report message to a moderator

Re: No code generated for literals? [message #1765132 is a reply to message #1764704]

Tue, 06 June 2017 21:47

Ansgar Radermacher

Messages: 461
Registered: March 2011
Location: Paris Saclay, France

Senior Member

This is currently not supported. Can you please file a bug with severity = enhancement ?
The manual definitions via the <<Include>> stereotypes are outside the namespace definition since it would be problematic, if other files are included from within the namespace. This is not a problem for #defines (since they ignore the namespace), but for "real" constant definitions.

Report message to a moderator