Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » General (non-technical) » Eclipse Foundation » Starting a Project: Time needed for trademark review
Starting a Project: Time needed for trademark review [message #1713648] Thu, 05 November 2015 17:12 Go to next message
Gary Liu is currently offline Gary LiuFriend
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2015
Junior Member
From reading the handbook, the time it takes to complete a trademark review will vary and the range is quite big (which I understand why).

May I ask if someone who has experience with the review can share some information on roughly how long it takes usually?

Thank you.
Re: Starting a Project: Time needed for trademark review [message #1713849 is a reply to message #1713648] Sat, 07 November 2015 04:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33137
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Gary,

It typically takes a week or two.

On 06/11/2015 5:38 PM, Gary Liu wrote:
> From reading the handbook, the time it takes to complete a trademark
> review will vary and the range is quite big (which I understand why).
>
> May I ask if someone who has experience with the review can share some
> information on roughly how long it takes usually?
> Thank you.


Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Re: Starting a Project: Time needed for trademark review [message #1714099 is a reply to message #1713849] Mon, 09 November 2015 21:23 Go to previous message
Gary Liu is currently offline Gary LiuFriend
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2015
Junior Member
Thank you.
Previous Topic:"Are users reporting what developers asking? Help Swinburne university researcher find out!
Next Topic:EclipseCon 2016 - March 7-10 in Reston, Virginia
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 19 22:32:10 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03564 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top