|
| Re: Allowed children of a XSDSimpleTypeDefinition [message #33039 is a reply to message #33003] |
Wed, 12 November 2003 17:52  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Dennis,
This way the menu item is disabled rather than disappearing so it keeps the menu
looking consistent for every simple type.
dfuglsang wrote:
> Ed,
>
> I am a little confused (again :-) about a piece of logic in
> XSDSimpleTypeDefinitionItemProvider.collectNewChildDescripto rs(...). The
> logic, shown below, adds a new child descriptor to the list regardless of
> whether canAccomodateFacet(std,facet) returns true or false. Reading the
> javadoc for canAccomodateFacet(...) it seems that if this method returns
> false then the simple datatype cannot accomodate the given constraining
> facet and should not even be returned as a permissible child. Should it be
> creating a CommandParameter instance with a null feature reference?
>
> // facets
> for (Iterator i = validFacets.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
> {
> XSDConstrainingFacet facet =
>
> (XSDConstrainingFacet)xsdFactory.create((EClass)xsdPackage.g etEClassifier(fo
> rmFacetTypeName(i.next())));
> facet.setLexicalValue("");
> feature = !canAccomodateFacet(std, facet) ? null : <<<<<
> xsdPackage.getXSDSimpleTypeDefinition_FacetContents();
> newChildDescriptors.add(createChildParameter(feature, facet));
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dennis
|
|
|
| Re: Allowed children of a XSDSimpleTypeDefinition [message #580758 is a reply to message #33003] |
Wed, 12 November 2003 17:52 |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33137
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Dennis,
This way the menu item is disabled rather than disappearing so it keeps the menu
looking consistent for every simple type.
dfuglsang wrote:
> Ed,
>
> I am a little confused (again :-) about a piece of logic in
> XSDSimpleTypeDefinitionItemProvider.collectNewChildDescripto rs(...). The
> logic, shown below, adds a new child descriptor to the list regardless of
> whether canAccomodateFacet(std,facet) returns true or false. Reading the
> javadoc for canAccomodateFacet(...) it seems that if this method returns
> false then the simple datatype cannot accomodate the given constraining
> facet and should not even be returned as a permissible child. Should it be
> creating a CommandParameter instance with a null feature reference?
>
> // facets
> for (Iterator i = validFacets.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
> {
> XSDConstrainingFacet facet =
>
> (XSDConstrainingFacet)xsdFactory.create((EClass)xsdPackage.g etEClassifier(fo
> rmFacetTypeName(i.next())));
> facet.setLexicalValue("");
> feature = !canAccomodateFacet(std, facet) ? null : <<<<<
> xsdPackage.getXSDSimpleTypeDefinition_FacetContents();
> newChildDescriptors.add(createChildParameter(feature, facet));
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dennis
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02103 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
