|Re: EMap performance compared to HashMap? [message #1534867 is a reply to message #1531752]
||Mon, 29 December 2014 10:48
| Ed Merks
Registered: July 2009
I've not done a details analysis but they should be quite comparable.
I'm sure HashMap has seen more performance tuning that has gone into
BasicEMap, e.g., better collision handling. In any case, it's hard to
imagine that the performance difference would become a significant
performance concern in a larger application.
On 27/12/2014 5:29 PM, Joel Greenyer wrote:
> does anyone know how the performance of a BasicEMap compares to a
> HashMap? I mean mainly the speed of get()-operation?
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01447 seconds