| Unexpected EOpposite validation error [message #1449488] |
Tue, 21 October 2014 08:42  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Scenario:
* Take a look at the attached diagrams
* First create the upper diagram
* Then select the containment relationship and choose the other as its EOpposite.
* Validate...
Result:
* You obtain the lower diagram, with validation marks on the connection "The opposite of the opposite may not be a reference different from this one".
* The original connector to "myOwner" does not disappear, but the other one becomes multi-edged anyway. If you delete the original myOwner connection, also the myOwner edge of the multi-edged one disappears. This demonstrates that they are linked as one would expect.
Question:
I know that the manual prescribes the use of the palette item "bi-directional reference". The fact that you can also choose an EOpposite on a normal Composition would trigger one to expect that you can evolve a normal Composition into one having an EOpposite.
Can this strange behaviour be avoided?
Environment:
* Eclipse Luna
* Ecore Diagram Editor 2.0.2.201409150953 (same behaviour in nightly)
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06625 seconds
Home
