|
Re: No repository found at http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released. [message #1444000 is a reply to message #1443823] |
Mon, 13 October 2014 14:19 |
Thomas Schindl Messages: 6651 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On 13.10.14 16:09, Thomas Gawehn wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> I've installed
>
> e(fx)clipse - IDE - Updatesite -
> http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/updates-released/1.0.0/site
>
> via the Eclipse "Install New Software"-function.
>
> Now, when I want do perform "Check for Updates" I get the following
> error during the update-check-process:
>
> No repository found at
> http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released.
>
http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released is not a p2 repo
so it makes no sense that it is in the update site. I have no idea how
and why this site could have been added to the p2-repos to search for
updates.
> Furthermore, when running the
>
> File -> New -> Other -> JavaFX -> New FXGraph Wizard
>
> I get the following error:
>
> Failed to create injector for org.eclipse.fx.ide.fxgraph.FXGraph
> ExtensionFactory:
> org.eclipse.fx.ide.fxgraph.ui.FXGraphExecutableExtensionFactory
>
> Seems, as if the installation went somehow wrong. Do you have any hints?
>
My wild guess is that this fails because of a mismatch between installed
Xbase you have and the one we require. What's the version of Xtext/Xtend
you have installed?
> I have syntax highlighting support for fxml but no edit time error hints.
>
... the XML-Editor should not be affected by the FXGraph problems it does
not need that at all.
> I was looking for your fxml-compiler, but didn't find a download-link
> for the 1.0.0-e(fx)clipse version, only for the 0.9.0-version, but I
> didn't want to mix that with 1.0.0 version, so I didn't install that.
>
Unfortunately the 1.0.0 release of the compiler is broken - I'm
currently working on that so that at least the nightly compiler stuff is
in shape when we release 1.1.0 so even if I'd provide you the link it
would not be functional :-(
Tom
|
|
|
Re: No repository found at http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released. [message #1444069 is a reply to message #1444000] |
Mon, 13 October 2014 15:39 |
Thomas Schindl Messages: 6651 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
FYI - a sample project with a working fxml-compiler is checked into the
repo at
http://git.eclipse.org/c/efxclipse/org.eclipse.efxclipse.git/tree/demos/org.eclipse.fx.samples.fxml.compiler
Tom
On 13.10.14 16:19, Tom Schindl wrote:
> On 13.10.14 16:09, Thomas Gawehn wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> I've installed
>>
>> e(fx)clipse - IDE - Updatesite -
>> http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/updates-released/1.0.0/site
>>
>> via the Eclipse "Install New Software"-function.
>>
>> Now, when I want do perform "Check for Updates" I get the following
>> error during the update-check-process:
>>
>> No repository found at
>> http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released.
>>
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/compiler-released is not a p2 repo
> so it makes no sense that it is in the update site. I have no idea how
> and why this site could have been added to the p2-repos to search for
> updates.
>
>> Furthermore, when running the
>>
>> File -> New -> Other -> JavaFX -> New FXGraph Wizard
>>
>> I get the following error:
>>
>> Failed to create injector for org.eclipse.fx.ide.fxgraph.FXGraph
>> ExtensionFactory:
>> org.eclipse.fx.ide.fxgraph.ui.FXGraphExecutableExtensionFactory
>>
>> Seems, as if the installation went somehow wrong. Do you have any hints?
>>
>
> My wild guess is that this fails because of a mismatch between installed
> Xbase you have and the one we require. What's the version of Xtext/Xtend
> you have installed?
>
>> I have syntax highlighting support for fxml but no edit time error hints.
>>
>
> .. the XML-Editor should not be affected by the FXGraph problems it does
> not need that at all.
>
>> I was looking for your fxml-compiler, but didn't find a download-link
>> for the 1.0.0-e(fx)clipse version, only for the 0.9.0-version, but I
>> didn't want to mix that with 1.0.0 version, so I didn't install that.
>>
>
> Unfortunately the 1.0.0 release of the compiler is broken - I'm
> currently working on that so that at least the nightly compiler stuff is
> in shape when we release 1.1.0 so even if I'd provide you the link it
> would not be functional :-(
>
> Tom
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03851 seconds