Running our own internal update site [message #221350] |
Fri, 13 July 2007 10:48 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: user.domain.invalid
Dear All,
We are looking to standardize on Europa but we need to control the exact
version etc that our users have so our tools can have known baselines
for EMF, GMF/GEF etc. for the rest of our tooling.
Also we want to be able to offer our users a single internal update site
which all our builds of eclipse can point to (via pre-configured
bookmarks.xml etc)
So is there anyway we can rsync/wget or similar the Europa etc update
sites & bring them up on an internal webserver?
Is there a known way of doing this as I assume other organizations must
have tackled this same thing in the past?
Adam
|
|
|
|
Re: Running our own internal update site [message #222109 is a reply to message #221990] |
Wed, 18 July 2007 10:11 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: user.domain.invalid
Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> If you fill out the mirror request form here:
> http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/mir_request.php , and make sure to put
> [INTERNAL] before your organization name, we'll add your IP into our IP
> access list and you'll be able to rsync the Europa data. This will mean
> that when users from your network connect to us and browse for a file
> the first mirror they will see will be your mirror.
>
Thanks.
I'll go and have a chat with our ICT ppl.
Adam
> -Webmaster
>
> AdamF wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> We are looking to standardize on Europa but we need to control the
>> exact version etc that our users have so our tools can have known
>> baselines for EMF, GMF/GEF etc. for the rest of our tooling.
>>
>> Also we want to be able to offer our users a single internal update
>> site which all our builds of eclipse can point to (via pre-configured
>> bookmarks.xml etc)
>>
>> So is there anyway we can rsync/wget or similar the Europa etc update
>> sites & bring them up on an internal webserver?
>>
>> Is there a known way of doing this as I assume other organizations
>> must have tackled this same thing in the past?
>>
>> Adam
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08157 seconds