| Compound Direct Graph and labeled Edges [message #196115] |
Fri, 16 September 2005 12:57  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: swaroop_rks.rediffmail.com
Hi,
We use Compound Direct Graph as a mechanism for auto-layout, the final
graph is pretty clean, provided that all the figures are of the same
dimension. There is a glitch we face, as it appears that the edge labels
are not accounted while computing the coordinates for laying out. The
resultant figure contains labels which are attimes closely cluttered and
unreadable. It becomes unselectable for a user to select an edge if there
are edges going to and forth as the second connection figure completely
eclipses the first connection, No bend points are calculated
here,(A=>B,A<=B ; <= dominates => )
Can i have some pointers in these aspects.
Ideally i would like to have a layout which is knowledgable of figure
dimensions and edge labels and edge directions. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
|
|
|
| Re: Compound Direct Graph and labeled Edges [message #196150 is a reply to message #196115] |
Fri, 16 September 2005 14:16  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
We do not have an algorithm that considers edge label sizes and positions.
If you know of any research in this area or have suggestions please open a
feature request via bugzilla.
"swaroop" <swaroop_rks@rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:45af3714ea238475dda455b40d91c1ce$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> We use Compound Direct Graph as a mechanism for auto-layout, the final
> graph is pretty clean, provided that all the figures are of the same
> dimension. There is a glitch we face, as it appears that the edge labels
> are not accounted while computing the coordinates for laying out. The
> resultant figure contains labels which are attimes closely cluttered and
> unreadable. It becomes unselectable for a user to select an edge if there
> are edges going to and forth as the second connection figure completely
> eclipses the first connection, No bend points are calculated
> here,(A=>B,A<=B ; <= dominates => )
>
> Can i have some pointers in these aspects.
>
> Ideally i would like to have a layout which is knowledgable of figure
> dimensions and edge labels and edge directions. Any help is greatly
> appreciated.
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02548 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
