Eclipse Community Forums: EclipseLink » How to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1?

Home » Eclipse Projects » EclipseLink » How to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1?(java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/persistence/jpa/jpql/parser/ExpressionVisitor)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

How to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1? [message #1043875]

Thu, 18 April 2013 08:08

Markus KARG

Messages: 28
Registered: June 2011

Junior Member

For bug fixing, we want to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1.
So we downloaded the OSGi bundle and replaced some JARs in GlassFish's module folder, but it seems this was not enough, as we still get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/persistence/jpa/jpql/parser/ExpressionVisitor -- but the jpql JAR definitively is in the modules Folder!

Can someone tell us the exact list of JARs we have to provide to GlassFish 3.1.1?

Thanks a lot! Smile

-Markus

Report message to a moderator

Re: How to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1? [message #1047661 is a reply to message #1043875]

Tue, 23 April 2013 13:49

James Sutherland

Messages: 1939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Senior Member

See,

http://computingat40s.wordpress.com/installing-glassfish-3-1-2-2/

It seems you may need to delete the Felix cache.

James : Wiki : Book : Blog : Twitter

Report message to a moderator

Re: How to use EclipseLink 2.4.1 in GlassFish 3.1.1? [message #1047671 is a reply to message #1047661]

Tue, 23 April 2013 14:02

Markus KARG

Messages: 28
Registered: June 2011

Junior Member

James,

thank you for sharing this link. Smile

In fact we made it work for us in GlassFish 3.1.1, but we only replaced the following:

org.eclipse.persistence.core_2.4.1.v20121003-ad44345.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.jpql_2.0.1.v20121003-ad44345.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.modelgen_2.4.1.v20121003-ad44345.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa_2.4.1.v20121003-ad44345.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.oracle_2.4.1.v20121003-ad44345.jar

Do you think it is to be considered as harmful that we did not also replace that lot of additional JARs mentioned in the blog posting you shared? Confused