Refactoring works only partially [message #13423] |
Fri, 30 January 2009 09:58  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
Trying to solve the problem of blank names in packages when imported from
RSM SID, I refactor my packages, like changing "Logical View" to
"LogicalView". however, it does not change the package statement of the
java files.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #14362 is a reply to message #13423] |
Fri, 30 January 2009 21:09   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Marc,
From an import, package names with a <space> shouldn't exist. In fact, we
prohibit <space> in package names, so I suspect from then on Tigerstripe is
confused and can't perform a proper refactor. Not sure why/how you got that
<space> thru the import, as the import is designed to specifically avoid it.
I'll let Richard comment/investigate further.
That being said, we are re-working the refactoring support to enhance
performance and make it a lot more robust. We are actively working on this
(Bug 260907).
Eric
On 1/30/09 10:58 AM, in article
7b8c03ce860b1e4fe999046cb4503a60$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to solve the problem of blank names in packages when imported from
> RSM SID, I refactor my packages, like changing "Logical View" to
> "LogicalView". however, it does not change the package statement of the
> java files.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #14380 is a reply to message #14362] |
Mon, 02 February 2009 13:28   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Eric,
Thanks for the reply. I was trying importing from RSM SID into Tigerstripe
and the packages in RSM have blank.
Since then, I heard throuch Chris of a specific SID import plug-in that
should replace those blanks. I thought it was part of the base product.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #14408 is a reply to message #14362] |
Mon, 02 February 2009 15:09  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Eric,
Standard UML Import in Tigerstripe does not see mto remove blanks in
package names as SID had those and there were not removed.
I am now using the SID import plug-in and the blanks are replaced by _
I tried refactoring on package names without blanks and this works better.
I still have an issue with Association artifacts, as it seems the package
names in the a-end/ z-end are not refactored.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #564262 is a reply to message #13423] |
Fri, 30 January 2009 21:09  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Marc,
From an import, package names with a <space> shouldn't exist. In fact, we
prohibit <space> in package names, so I suspect from then on Tigerstripe is
confused and can't perform a proper refactor. Not sure why/how you got that
<space> thru the import, as the import is designed to specifically avoid it.
I'll let Richard comment/investigate further.
That being said, we are re-working the refactoring support to enhance
performance and make it a lot more robust. We are actively working on this
(Bug 260907).
Eric
On 1/30/09 10:58 AM, in article
7b8c03ce860b1e4fe999046cb4503a60$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to solve the problem of blank names in packages when imported from
> RSM SID, I refactor my packages, like changing "Logical View" to
> "LogicalView". however, it does not change the package statement of the
> java files.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #564279 is a reply to message #14362] |
Mon, 02 February 2009 13:28  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Eric,
Thanks for the reply. I was trying importing from RSM SID into Tigerstripe
and the packages in RSM have blank.
Since then, I heard throuch Chris of a specific SID import plug-in that
should replace those blanks. I thought it was part of the base product.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #564300 is a reply to message #14362] |
Mon, 02 February 2009 15:09  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Eric,
Standard UML Import in Tigerstripe does not see mto remove blanks in
package names as SID had those and there were not removed.
I am now using the SID import plug-in and the blanks are replaced by _
I tried refactoring on package names without blanks and this works better.
I still have an issue with Association artifacts, as it seems the package
names in the a-end/ z-end are not refactored.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03704 seconds