| JBossIDE strange packaging [message #143021] |
Mon, 10 October 2005 08:50  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thisisnot.mymail.com
I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based on
WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging wizards
instead of dividing the project into separate modules like WTP? If we do
the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are JBossAS oriented
and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be possible to do it
later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they follow this newsgroup)
http://trailblazer.demo.jboss.com/IDETrail/ejb3/packaging/
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: JBossIDE strange packaging [message #144637 is a reply to message #144618] |
Thu, 20 October 2005 11:07  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: thisisnot.mymail.com
We'd be glad to, can you give us a link to the JBossIDE forum?
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0200, Srgjan Srepfler
> <thisisnot@mymail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based
>> on WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging
>> wizards instead of dividing the project into separate modules like
>> WTP? If we do the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are
>> JBossAS oriented and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be
>> possible to do it later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they
>> follow this newsgroup)
>>
>
> Any reason why you dont ask this on the jboss ide dev forum ? ;)
>
> but anyway - the packaging wizards has a big advantage over the
> separate modules
> WTP support and that is it can be used with *any* project layout -
> including WTP.
>
> We are looking into (and very open to suggestions/corrections etc.) how
> we can integrate
> this well/better with WTP.
>
> But please do that on the jboss ide dev forum since we don't monitor
> these forums
> daily for jbosside dev specific questions.
>
> /max
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 3.35186 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
