|
Re: MXF Proposal [message #132458 is a reply to message #132399] |
Fri, 23 January 2009 15:06 |
Michael Soden Messages: 27 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi David,
David Sciamma schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Anyware Technologies would like to be listed as Interested Parties in
> the MXF proposal.
Ok, I'll add you to the list.
>
> We already worked on this topic (Model execution and simulation), so the
> MXF project can be an opportunity to collaborate.
>
> Best regards,
>
So I guess you can contribute many ideas from your experiences. More
than that, I hope we can collaborate for the editor parts of MXF. Our
current implementation (proposed code basis) is basically an extension
of EcoreTools plugins (which reuses the diagram.ui.outline and some
manual written code related to the editing domain ;), but I had to
change many parts - keyword: visual-id registry...
Once we really start with MXF, it would be great if we can make it a
'true' extension.
Best wishes,
Michael
|
|
|
Re: MXF Proposal [message #620599 is a reply to message #132399] |
Fri, 23 January 2009 15:06 |
Michael Soden Messages: 27 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi David,
David Sciamma schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Anyware Technologies would like to be listed as Interested Parties in
> the MXF proposal.
Ok, I'll add you to the list.
>
> We already worked on this topic (Model execution and simulation), so the
> MXF project can be an opportunity to collaborate.
>
> Best regards,
>
So I guess you can contribute many ideas from your experiences. More
than that, I hope we can collaborate for the editor parts of MXF. Our
current implementation (proposed code basis) is basically an extension
of EcoreTools plugins (which reuses the diagram.ui.outline and some
manual written code related to the editing domain ;), but I had to
change many parts - keyword: visual-id registry...
Once we really start with MXF, it would be great if we can make it a
'true' extension.
Best wishes,
Michael
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03306 seconds