Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » Visual Editor (VE) » Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver.
Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver. [message #126656] Wed, 21 June 2006 12:29 Go to next message
hung is currently offline hungFriend
Messages: 117
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hello,
Does anyone know what this message is about? and How to fix it? Thanks.
Re: Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver. [message #126681 is a reply to message #126656] Wed, 21 June 2006 14:15 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com

It typically means you had a call to a local method. You can try putting
"this.xxx" in front, but if the method is defined in the class being
edited and not in the superclass then it can't be called during VE
editing time. That is because we can't instantiate an instance of the
class being edited since it is constantly changing. So instead we
instantiate the superclass and then try to interpret the class being
edited. We can handle calls to get methods that we know return beans,
but we can't call general methods since the class isn't actually
instantiated and running.

Hung wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know what this message is about? and How to fix it? Thanks.

--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
Re: Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver. [message #613384 is a reply to message #126656] Wed, 21 June 2006 14:15 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com

It typically means you had a call to a local method. You can try putting
"this.xxx" in front, but if the method is defined in the class being
edited and not in the superclass then it can't be called during VE
editing time. That is because we can't instantiate an instance of the
class being edited since it is constantly changing. So instead we
instantiate the superclass and then try to interpret the class being
edited. We can handle calls to get methods that we know return beans,
but we can't call general methods since the class isn't actually
instantiated and running.

Hung wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know what this message is about? and How to fix it? Thanks.

--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
Previous Topic:IWAV0177E Expression 'xxx' is too complicated
Next Topic:VE Enhancement Request
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 25 09:09:47 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02983 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top