|
|
|
Re: Cannot find a solution satisfying the following requirements org.eclipse.equ [message #126735 is a reply to message #126650] |
Sun, 01 March 2009 21:15 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: andrew.eisenberg.springsource.com
Thanks. Very much looking forward to trying this. I know you are working
hard on this, but to be honest, my experiences with p2 so far have left a
bad taste in my mouth. It does seem that p2 has made some big leaps forward
already in 3.5.
On 28/02/09 10:27 AM, in article
3e8212a222ce76d38e19102cc73b7812$1@www.eclipse.org,
"Pascal_Rapicault@ca.ibm.com" <Pascal_Rapicault@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>> This really needs sorting for 3.5. P2's made some great advances, but
>> the end user shouldn't be stuck with poor user experience...
> This is the topic of bug 200380 (http://bugs.eclipse.org/200380). We
> have released something for that for next week I build but you will have
> to turn it on manually (-Dp2.new.explanation=true) because we still have
> performance issues with this new support.
>
>> especially compared to the ease of finding and installing plugins for
> IntelliJ IDEA.
> I never had the chance to see it. Could you please tell more? Is it in
> the UI, in the mechanism, etc?
>
> PaScaL
>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Cannot find a solution satisfying the following requirements org.eclipse.equ [message #126800 is a reply to message #126650] |
Mon, 02 March 2009 20:11 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: andrew.eisenberg.springsource.com
Just tried out the new explanation mechanism and found it very useful. I
did not see any noticeable slowdown and I was able to diagnose my original
problem quickly. This goes a long way to making p2 better.
Thank you.
> This is the topic of bug 200380 (http://bugs.eclipse.org/200380). We
> have released something for that for next week I build but you will have
> to turn it on manually (-Dp2.new.explanation=true) because we still have
> performance issues with this new support.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02580 seconds