|
|
| Re: EMF-Model is a Metamodel? [message #871346 is a reply to message #871339] |
Sat, 12 May 2012 09:07   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
then, i assume, UML2 (implementation of UML 2.x metamodel) can also be
named as EMF-Model? (and instance of Ecore too?)
On 12.05.2012 10:00, Ed Merks wrote:
> Yes, all *.ecore resources contain an EPackage with EClasses and those
> classes can instantiate instances that implement the EObject instances
> and so on such an instance you can call EObject.eClass(); that EClass is
> the meta model for that instance.
>
> On 11/05/2012 10:37 PM, Emil Huseynli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is that a true statement? sorry for newbie question :)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Emil
|
|
|
| Re: EMF-Model is a Metamodel? [message #871347 is a reply to message #871346] |
Sat, 12 May 2012 09:18 |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33140
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Emil,
Yes.
On 12/05/2012 11:07 AM, Emil Huseynli wrote:
> then, i assume, UML2 (implementation of UML 2.x metamodel) can also be
> named as EMF-Model? (and instance of Ecore too?)
>
> On 12.05.2012 10:00, Ed Merks wrote:
>> Yes, all *.ecore resources contain an EPackage with EClasses and those
>> classes can instantiate instances that implement the EObject instances
>> and so on such an instance you can call EObject.eClass(); that EClass is
>> the meta model for that instance.
>>
>> On 11/05/2012 10:37 PM, Emil Huseynli wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is that a true statement? sorry for newbie question :)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Emil
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02673 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
