ClearCase support? [message #9541] |
Thu, 04 May 2006 08:01 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: loehrm.external.qimonda.com
I have noticed that with a M3 build, there is support using CVS for
version control. Are there any plans to support ClearCase as well. This is
a major issue for us now since we try to work with more people on the same
plug-in.
Note to current guide how to use version control (with CC) is just
unworkable in a real project...
|
|
|
|
|
Re: ClearCase support? [message #9660 is a reply to message #9614] |
Fri, 12 May 2006 08:30 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: loehrm.external.qimonda.com
Hi Peter, I am fine, thanks.
We are currently using EPF to define a 'new' iterative software dev
process for Infineon/Qimonda (for the Manufacturing IT dep.; Qimonda has
now split off Infineon to be the world 2nd largest memory manufacturer),
based on OpenUP and their legacy waterfall "system engineer" process.
Currently we have 3 fulltime team members.
I have already submitted 5 bugs/enhancement for the tool side. We enjoy
working with EPF except for the current lack for multi-user support (which
will come with M3 hopefully).
Sure, will consider the committer job..
Keep up the good work.
BTW Peter, are you guys already thinking on active process support (as
known by IJC)?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: ClearCase support? [message #563100 is a reply to message #9614] |
Fri, 12 May 2006 08:30 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: loehrm.external.qimonda.com
Hi Peter, I am fine, thanks.
We are currently using EPF to define a 'new' iterative software dev
process for Infineon/Qimonda (for the Manufacturing IT dep.; Qimonda has
now split off Infineon to be the world 2nd largest memory manufacturer),
based on OpenUP and their legacy waterfall "system engineer" process.
Currently we have 3 fulltime team members.
I have already submitted 5 bugs/enhancement for the tool side. We enjoy
working with EPF except for the current lack for multi-user support (which
will come with M3 hopefully).
Sure, will consider the committer job..
Keep up the good work.
BTW Peter, are you guys already thinking on active process support (as
known by IJC)?
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03764 seconds