Another DLTK Mini-HOWTO coming soon [message #8546] |
Thu, 19 July 2007 06:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: fourdman.xored.com
Hi folks,
We are sorry again about lack of attention to the newsgroup and mailing
list. We are working on this our problem and from now I hope we'll
answer on your questions in time.
As you can see there are really a lot of questions like "how to
implement <feature-name-here> with a DLTK". The best answer to such
questions would be a documentation, but unfortunately we don't have
such. So, I decided to write not a big, but I think useful in practice,
document with a name like "Mini-HOWTO: Implement modern IDE features
with a DLTK". I plan to consider main DLTK features like completion,
navigation, search etc. and write in short about main classes and
extension points related to this. I think, it should take not more than
a couple of days, so in the nearest future I promise to publish it.
Thanks for your interest in DLTK,
Mikhail Kalugin
|
|
|
|
Re: Another DLTK Mini-HOWTO coming soon [message #11256 is a reply to message #8546] |
Sun, 22 July 2007 10:04  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dennis.dennis.co.uk
Does the title "Another DLTK Mini-HOWTO" imply that some HOWTO already
exists? If yes, where?
> document with a name like "Mini-HOWTO: Implement modern IDE features
> with a DLTK". I plan to consider main DLTK features like completion,
> navigation, search etc. and write in short about main classes and
> extension points related to this.
Please consider to document the main classes and extension points that are
needed to get started, before documenting those related to implementing
modern features.
> I think, it should take not more than
> a couple of days, so in the nearest future I promise to publish it.
Is a couple of day more like O(7) or O(365)? I'm asking because in the
meantime I think that I can more efficiently implement all features myself
than waiting for documentation. Usually you spend less time coding software
yourself than understanding undocumented code.
Dennis
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03174 seconds