|Re: [teneo] Is Inheritance variant TABLE_PER_CLASS still unsupported [message #67977 is a reply to message #67894]
||Thu, 11 January 2007 14:38
Originally posted by: user.domain.com|
Its seems to to work altough I havent really tested it.
As requested I added a buzilla entry: 170221 for adding test cases
Martin Taal wrote:
> We have no test case for this inheritance strategy. You can try to set
> it using an annotation. The source code handles the annotation but I
> have not yet tried it.
> The global inheritance option parameter does not allow table-per-class.
> Please enter a bugzilla if you want (explicitly-tested) support for this.
> gr. Martin
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> I saw in the elver.org doc that Inheritance variant TABLE_PER_CLASS
>> was not supporter but in the
>> " http://www.elver.org/xsd/teneo/persistence-mapping-hibernate .xsd"
>> the TABLE_PER_CLASS is a valid enymeration
>> <xsd:simpleType name="InheritanceType">
>> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:token">
>> <xsd:enumeration value="SINGLE_TABLE"/>
>> <xsd:enumeration value="TABLE_PER_CLASS"/>
>> <xsd:enumeration value="JOINED"/>
>> So I have a question; is the Inheritance variant TABLE_PER_CLASS
>> Anyone got a clue?
>> regards and thanks for any hints
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.03370 seconds