Problems resolving eclipse bundles [message #644618] |
Mon, 13 December 2010 13:51 |
|
Hi Folks,
I have a correct TP import and a correct WS import. Still the bucky build cannot resolve org.osgi and org.eclipse.runtime in hudson. Any ideas where I could go look. I don't have version restrictions on my bundles..
Here are some relevant (I hope) snippets from the build:
Regards,
Wim
importtargetdefinition '-A' '/home/gravity/.hudson/jobs/TD_OMS_Update_Site/workspace//co m.remainsoftware.td.releng.feature/TDOMS Base Target Hudson.target'
Doing full workspace refresh
Waiting for jobs to end
JOB: File Transport Cancel Handler(511) is still active
JOB: File Transport Cancel Handler(693) is still active
JOB: File Transport Cancel Handler(674) is still active
listtargetdefinitions
Using workspace at file:/home/gravity/.hudson/jobs/TD_OMS_Update_Site/workspace / ...
Target platform provided by class org.eclipse.buckminster.pde.internal.PDETargetPlatform
Running Platform : linux,gtk,x86/en_US
Target Platform : linux,gtk,x86/en_US
* TDOMS Base Target : linux,gtk,x86/en_US
Doing full workspace refresh
Waiting for jobs to end
import '/home/gravity/.hudson/jobs/TD_OMS_Update_Site/workspace//co m.remainsoftware.td.releng.feature/oms_all.cquery'
Platform install location: /home/gravity/.hudson/tools/bucky36/buckminster
com.remainsoftware.td.releng.feature:eclipse.feature/[6.0.3. qualifier,6.0.3.qualifier]: Using resolver rmap
com.remainsoftware.td.releng.feature:eclipse.feature/[6.0.3. qualifier,6.0.3.qualifier]: Using resolver Local resolver
<snip/>
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Using resolver Local resolver
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Trying provider local(materialized)
No materialization found for org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Trying provider local(workspace)
No open workspace project found that corresponds to org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Trying provider local(target)
org.eclipse.text:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Found match org.eclipse.text:osgi.bundle$3.5.0.v20100601-1300
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Found match 3.6.0.v20100505
org.eclipse.jface:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Using resolver Local resolver
org.eclipse.jface:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Trying provider local(materialized)
No materialization found for org.eclipse.jface:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.jface:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Trying provider local(workspace)
No open workspace project found that corresponds to org.eclipse.jface:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0)
org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle/[3.5.0,4.0.0): Found match org.eclipse.core.runtime:osgi.bundle$3.6.0.v20100505
<snip/>
INFO: Import complete.
Doing full workspace refresh
Waiting for jobs to end
build
<snip/>
Error: file /home/gravity/.hudson/jobs/TD_OMS_Update_Site/workspace/plug ins/nl.remain.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF, line 10: Bundle 'org.eclipse.core.runtime' cannot be resolved
Error: file /home/gravity/.hudson/jobs/TD_OMS_Update_Site/workspace/plug ins/nl.remain.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF, line 11: Bundle 'org.eclipse.ui' cannot be resolved
|
|
|
Re: Problems resolving eclipse bundles [message #644711 is a reply to message #644618] |
Mon, 13 December 2010 21:26 |
|
Hi,
For the target platform, I use a combined extraction from a network drive and 4 remote sites. I do a test resolve with the TP on my W7 machine and the actual build is happening on a Ubuntu Hudson. This gives the resolve error mentioned in the previous post.
I tried to aggregate all plugins and features into two local directories and created a TP out of that. When running on my Ubuntu Hudson at home this will resolve the previously unresolved plugins.
Maybe it is not important but I noticed that buckminster/PDE did not copy the plugins and features from the network drive into the .metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.pde.core/.bundle_pool/ directory. However, that directory did contain the org.eclipse.core.runtime. I guess that local directories are linked?
If you have some ideas and suggestions that I can try that would be great.
Regards,
Wim Jongman
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02962 seconds