| [ClassD] Is it possible to show... [message #623183] |
Mon, 24 November 2008 21:50 |
 Nicolas Rouquette
Messages: 157
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
....the following with the M3 build of UML2Tools:
a) name & language of a constraint.
I can show a the definition of a constraint with the menu action:
"Create Shortcut..." but I don't see:
- the language used for specifying the constraint (e.g., OCL, Java, ...)
- the name of the constraint. Sometimes, fully-qualified names are too
long. It would be nice to show:
- the fully-qualified name in reverse order, or
- 1,2,..N levels of name qualification, enough to tell which element on
the diagram the constraint belongs, or
- a line between the element that owns the constraint and the shortcut
to the constraint
b) generalizations/associations across packages
Suppose I have:
- package P1 with class A
- package P2 with class B
- P2::B has a generalization relationship to P1::A
If I initialize a diagram for P2, the diagram automatically shows *all*
of the contents of P2. For small packages, this is OK but it is
definitely too much clutter for large packages.
I can create a shortcut to P1::A in the P2 class diagram.
However, I can't create either a shortcut or show the existing
generalization relationship from P2::B to P1::A
The same comment applies to other kinds of relationships such as
associations.
-- Nicolas.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02679 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
