|[HUTN] Difference between the implementation and the HUTN specification [message #592762]
||Tue, 10 August 2010 14:23
| Hallvard Traetteberg
Registered: July 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
I'm trying out Epsilon and HUTN for the first time, in the context of a
course in model-based development. So far, I've managed to create an
Ecore model, a config file for the model using HUTN and an instance of
the model using HUTN.
There seems to be some parts of the specification that is not
implementet. At least, I haven't been able to specify ParametricConfig
objects or defining a scope IdentifierConfig rules, based on the HUTN
specification I'm reading
(http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2004-08-01). In addition, there
seems to be some differences between the implementation and the
specification, e.g. the HUTN metamodel has the class IdentifierConfig,
while Epsilon uses IdentifierRule.
Is there a place where I can find more information about the difference
between the implementation and the HUTN specification?
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.02176 seconds