Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » Epsilon » [HUTN] Difference between the implementation and the HUTN specification
[HUTN] Difference between the implementation and the HUTN specification [message #592762] Tue, 10 August 2010 14:23
Hallvard Traetteberg is currently offline Hallvard TraettebergFriend
Messages: 662
Registered: July 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Senior Member
Hi,

I'm trying out Epsilon and HUTN for the first time, in the context of a
course in model-based development. So far, I've managed to create an
Ecore model, a config file for the model using HUTN and an instance of
the model using HUTN.

There seems to be some parts of the specification that is not
implementet. At least, I haven't been able to specify ParametricConfig
objects or defining a scope IdentifierConfig rules, based on the HUTN
specification I'm reading
(http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2004-08-01). In addition, there
seems to be some differences between the implementation and the
specification, e.g. the HUTN metamodel has the class IdentifierConfig,
while Epsilon uses IdentifierRule.

Is there a place where I can find more information about the difference
between the implementation and the HUTN specification?

Best regards,

Hallvard Trætteberg
Previous Topic:How to not append a result model each time running an etl transformation
Next Topic:[Eugenia] Icons in canvas and PopupMenu
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Aug 14 14:21:49 GMT 2018

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02553 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top