| [HUTN] Difference between the implementation and the HUTN specification [message #592762] |
Tue, 10 August 2010 14:23 |
 Hallvard Traetteberg
Messages: 673
Registered: July 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying out Epsilon and HUTN for the first time, in the context of a
course in model-based development. So far, I've managed to create an
Ecore model, a config file for the model using HUTN and an instance of
the model using HUTN.
There seems to be some parts of the specification that is not
implementet. At least, I haven't been able to specify ParametricConfig
objects or defining a scope IdentifierConfig rules, based on the HUTN
specification I'm reading
(http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2004-08-01). In addition, there
seems to be some differences between the implementation and the
specification, e.g. the HUTN metamodel has the class IdentifierConfig,
while Epsilon uses IdentifierRule.
Is there a place where I can find more information about the difference
between the implementation and the HUTN specification?
Best regards,
Hallvard Trætteberg
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03558 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
