| XDS pre-connectathon tests - how strict is it? [message #581537] |
Fri, 05 October 2007 11:42 |
 Takeo Satomi
Messages: 32
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Hi all,
I'm going to participate 2008 NA connectathon, first time ever, with XDS
doc consumer application using OHF Bridge. I've been struggling with my
first experience of SOAP and Java, but recently I managed to make a query
against a public server finally.
Now I'm looking through pre-connectathon tests and wondering how strictly
the test result will be examined. For example, with the test#11801, I'm
required to send a query defined in tests\11801\metadata.xml which has
conditions as
* eo.id = ei.registryobject
* ei.identificationScheme='urn:uuid:58a6f841-87b3-4a3e-92fd-a8 ffeff98427'
* ei.value='NIST-test-10^^^&1.3.6.1.4.1.21367.2005.3.7 &ISO'
* eo.status = 'Approved'
but a simple QueryDocumentsByPatientId call puts additional conditions like
* eo.status IN ('Approved', 'Deprecated', 'Withdrawn', 'Submitted')
* eo.objectType = 'urn:uuid:7edca82f-054d-47f2-a032-9b2a5b5186c1'
whereas
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/OHF_Bridge_Documentation#S earching_for_Documents
seems for me saying that the result would be accepted regardless of the
differences. Is that true? Or am I required to modify the Bridge so
that it can make a query which is exactly same as the given metadata.xml?
There're some more remarkable difference between instructions and actual
result - while
http://hcxw2k1.nist.gov/wiki/index.php/NIST_XDS_Test_Kit_200 6-2007_Test_Descriptions#11801
says I would get a single document, I actually got none at
http://hcxw2k1.nist.gov:8080/xdsServices2/registry/soap/port als/query and
four at .../portalsyr3a/query.
Should I make these ambiguous points clear before starting tests, or can I
expect some degree of gaps between the instruction and actual test would
be accepted?
Thanks in advance for your advice,
Takeo Satomi
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02536 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
