| AspectJ vs. AOP frameworks [message #576480] |
Sat, 20 March 2004 07:37 |
 Agent Smith
Messages: 2
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
I've seen that a lot of AOP frameworks exist. I wonder why there are so
many. AspectJ seems to be a very good AOP implementation in my eyes. Why
would someone prefer an AOP framework to AspectJ?
I am interested in the pros and cons of AspectJ and AOP frameworks. Is there
any article comparing them?
Personally I dislike implementations of AOP as a framework. The best thing
would be in my eyes, if Java would natively support AOP. This would require
that the core Java programming language is extended. The result would look
similiar to AspectJ. The second best solution in my eyes is using AspectJ.
After this (the third best), I consider using a good AOP framework better
than not using AOP at all. The larger the project, the more helpful AOP is.
What do you think about the topics I mentioned above, especially about the
pros and cons of AspectJ compared to AOP frameworks.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02817 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
