Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » [CDO] General UI question EMF.Edit
[CDO] General UI question EMF.Edit [message #538078] Fri, 04 June 2010 20:54 Go to next message
Miles Parker is currently offline Miles ParkerFriend
Messages: 1341
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

I'm investigating alternatives for a better persistence mechanism for very large ecore models. My reading of the docs for CDO is that is is not possible to use EMF.edit generated editors with a CDO back-end store. Is that correct, or have I just mis-interpreted something?

thanks,

Miles

Report message to a moderator

Re: [CDO] General UI question EMF.Edit [message #538114 is a reply to message #538078] Sat, 05 June 2010 06:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eike Stepper is currently offline Eike StepperFriend
Messages: 6682
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Am 04.06.2010 22:54, schrieb Miles Parker:
> Hi,
>
> I'm investigating alternatives for a better persistence mechanism for
> very large ecore models. My reading of the docs for CDO is that is is
> not possible to use EMF.edit generated editors with a CDO back-end
> store. Is that correct, or have I just mis-interpreted something?
The generated item providers (EMF.edit) will function in a normal way.
The generated editors will probably not function immediately and
unmodified because the ResourceSet has to be prepared in a slightly
different way. I think it should be comparingly easy to compare your
generated editor with the generic CDOEditor (basically all model editors
are almost fully generic) to see what you'll have to change. We're very
open to suggestions to make it easier for users to use their own
generated editors.

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper

Report message to a moderator

Re: [CDO] General UI question EMF.Edit [message #538143 is a reply to message #538114] Sat, 05 June 2010 16:51 Go to previous message
Miles Parker is currently offline Miles ParkerFriend
Messages: 1341
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
OK, great, thanks Eike. It was really the .edit ItemProviders I was concerned about as we have extensive customization of those. I was assuming that because there was a generic editor the edit components would be generic as well but I don't know why I assumed that!

Eike Stepper wrote on Sat, 05 June 2010 02:38
Am 04.06.2010 22:54, schrieb Miles Parker:
> Hi,
>
> I'm investigating alternatives for a better persistence mechanism for
> very large ecore models. My reading of the docs for CDO is that is is
> not possible to use EMF.edit generated editors with a CDO back-end
> store. Is that correct, or have I just mis-interpreted something?
The generated item providers (EMF.edit) will function in a normal way.
The generated editors will probably not function immediately and
unmodified because the ResourceSet has to be prepared in a slightly
different way. I think it should be comparingly easy to compare your
generated editor with the generic CDOEditor (basically all model editors
are almost fully generic) to see what you'll have to change. We're very
open to suggestions to make it easier for users to use their own
generated editors.

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:Enumerations Combo Box
Next Topic:EMF Change : referenceValue proxy not resolved
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 05:25:12 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.20936 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly