Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » EMF Transaction UI/RAP
EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #526845] Tue, 13 April 2010 09:26 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: edgar.m.mueller.gmail.com

Hi,

I'm currently trying to port some UI code that is using the
emf.transaction.ui to RAP.

The EMF/RAP wiki page was a big help to get started, but since there is
no emf.rap.transaction.ui package or the like, what would be the best
fit to handle declarations that make use of
TransactionalAdapterFactoryLabelProvider and
TransactionalAdapterFactoryContentProvider (since
TransactionalEditingDomain is not available)?

Are there any plans to provide an RAPified version of emf.transaction.ui?

Thanks & Regards

Edgar
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #526952 is a reply to message #526845] Tue, 13 April 2010 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 30551
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Edgar,

Comments below.

Edgar Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to port some UI code that is using the
> emf.transaction.ui to RAP.
>
> The EMF/RAP wiki page was a big help to get started, but since there is
> no emf.rap.transaction.ui package or the like, what would be the best
> fit to handle declarations that make use of
> TransactionalAdapterFactoryLabelProvider and
> TransactionalAdapterFactoryContentProvider (since
> TransactionalEditingDomain is not available)?
>
I think the transaction bundle relies on there being a workspace
indirectly via the validation framework's dependency.
> Are there any plans to provide an RAPified version of emf.transaction.ui?
>
The earlier problem seems kind of show stopping already... :-(
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Edgar
>
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #527183 is a reply to message #526952] Wed, 14 April 2010 11:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: edgar.m.mueller.gmail.com

Hi Ed,

Thanks for your answer.

Ed Merks wrote:
>> Are there any plans to provide an RAPified version of emf.transaction.ui?
>>
> The earlier problem seems kind of show stopping already... :-(

So there are no plans to provide transactions and validation (+ possible
dependencies) for EMF/RAP in the near future, such that an easy
transition to RAP would be possible?

Regards
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #527223 is a reply to message #527183] Wed, 14 April 2010 14:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 30551
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040000060105060302010506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Edgar,

I can't speak for the Validation and Transaction teams, but those
projects aren't exactly hotbeds of new activity. There are definitely
no immediate plans for RAP support from those projects, but with the
help of contributions, plans can be influenced...


Edgar Mueller wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>>> Are there any plans to provide an RAPified version of emf.transaction.ui?
>>>
>>>
>> The earlier problem seems kind of show stopping already... :-(
>>
>
> So there are no plans to provide transactions and validation (+ possible
> dependencies) for EMF/RAP in the near future, such that an easy
> transition to RAP would be possible?
>
> Regards
>

--------------040000060105060302010506
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Edgar,<br>
<br>
I can't speak for the Validation and Transaction teams, but those
projects aren't exactly hotbeds of new activity.
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #528634 is a reply to message #527223] Wed, 21 April 2010 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jonas Helming is currently offline Jonas HelmingFriend
Messages: 699
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I have filed bug reports to discuss this:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=309927
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=309926

Ed Merks wrote:
> Edgar,
>
> I can't speak for the Validation and Transaction teams, but those
> projects aren't exactly hotbeds of new activity. There are definitely
> no immediate plans for RAP support from those projects, but with the
> help of contributions, plans can be influenced...
>
>
> Edgar Mueller wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>>
>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>
>>>> Are there any plans to provide an RAPified version of emf.transaction.ui?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The earlier problem seems kind of show stopping already... :-(
>>>
>>
>> So there are no plans to provide transactions and validation (+ possible
>> dependencies) for EMF/RAP in the near future, such that an easy
>> transition to RAP would be possible?
>>
>> Regards
>>
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #650841 is a reply to message #528634] Wed, 26 January 2011 18:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
AJ  is currently offline AJ Friend
Messages: 77
Registered: July 2009
Member
What about emf.compare?

Is there no support for emf.compare either?
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #650844 is a reply to message #650841] Wed, 26 January 2011 19:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 30551
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
AJ,

No I expect Obeo is support that well...

Regards,
Ed

AJ wrote:
> What about emf.compare?
> Is there no support for emf.compare either?
Re: EMF Transaction UI/RAP [message #651520 is a reply to message #650841] Mon, 31 January 2011 14:29 Go to previous message
Cedric Brun is currently offline Cedric BrunFriend
Messages: 431
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

We don't have such plan already though we'd like to extract a "non Eclipse
IDE dependent" editor so that we can easily reuse it in an RCP context.

We'll try to keep an eye on having RAP as a target platform for this "non
IDE" editor, I can't say I know RAP a lot, I guess the tough part might be
the way we draw ourselves the lines between both versions of the model.

Any contribution in this regard : building RAPified "triple-synchronized-
tree-viewer" editor would probably help us to get started on this.



AJ wrote:

> What about emf.compare?
>
> Is there no support for emf.compare either?


http://cedric.brun.io news and articles on eclipse and eclipse modeling.
Previous Topic:Documentation of EMF Fragment-based URIs
Next Topic:Validation of default alue literals
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 17 16:49:50 GMT 2019

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02619 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top