| Keybinding problem after inheriting the eclipse default scheme [message #516192] |
Tue, 23 February 2010 01:53  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi All,
I met a problem when using key binding mechanism. In my RCP product I
have to use the accelerate key combination: "M1+N" to open a new editor,
but unfortunately the eclipse UI has already give the default action for
this combination.
So I apply a new scheme for this, and let
org.eclipse.ui.defaultAcceleratorConfiguration be the parentId.
It appears normal when I press Ctrl+N slowly, but when I frequently
press the Ctrl+N several times(without intterrupt), the Original Eclipse
New Wizard shows, its useless for my product.
In my handler, the process is a little slow. I think that's the problem,
for if I removed all the codes in the handler.execute() function,
everything works fine.
I'm confused by this behavior, seems even if the new scheme activated,
the keybindings in the old scheme can still have high priority in some
situation? Does anyone have the idea about this and give me some clue?
Great thanks!
|
|
|
| Re: Keybinding problem after inheriting the eclipse default scheme [message #516809 is a reply to message #516192] |
Wed, 24 February 2010 23:30  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Can anyone give me a clue? Thanks!
On 2/23/2010 2:53 PM, nemo.zhp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I met a problem when using key binding mechanism. In my RCP product I
> have to use the accelerate key combination: "M1+N" to open a new editor,
> but unfortunately the eclipse UI has already give the default action for
> this combination.
>
> So I apply a new scheme for this, and let
> org.eclipse.ui.defaultAcceleratorConfiguration be the parentId.
>
> It appears normal when I press Ctrl+N slowly, but when I frequently
> press the Ctrl+N several times(without intterrupt), the Original Eclipse
> New Wizard shows, its useless for my product.
>
> In my handler, the process is a little slow. I think that's the problem,
> for if I removed all the codes in the handler.execute() function,
> everything works fine.
>
> I'm confused by this behavior, seems even if the new scheme activated,
> the keybindings in the old scheme can still have high priority in some
> situation? Does anyone have the idea about this and give me some clue?
>
> Great thanks!
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03641 seconds
Home