Can't get Tomcat started on Eclipse 3.5 [message #514442] |
Mon, 15 February 2010 11:30 |
Don Wood Messages: 32 Registered: February 2010 Location: Pennsylvania |
Member |
|
|
I have Eclipse 3.4 and 3.5 loaded on my PC. I can start Tomcat in the 3.4 installation but when I attempt to start it in Eclipse 3.5, I receive the following message:
Several ports (8005, 8080, 8009) required by Tomcat v6.0 Server at
localhost are already in use. The server may already be running in
another process, or a system process may be using the port. To start
this server you will need to stop the other process or change the port
number(s).
However, using netstat and TCPView, I've ensured that, in fact, no process has these ports open. If I change Tomcat to use other ports, I get the same message with the port numbers reflecting my changes.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Re: Can't get Tomcat started on Eclipse 3.5 [message #514501 is a reply to message #514442] |
Mon, 15 February 2010 10:58 |
Larry Isaacs Messages: 1354 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
c-dowood@state.pa.us wrote:
> I have Eclipse 3.4 and 3.5 loaded on my PC. I can start Tomcat in the
> 3.4 installation but when I attempt to start it in Eclipse 3.5, I
> receive the following message:
>
> Several ports (8005, 8080, 8009) required by Tomcat v6.0 Server at
> localhost are already in use. The server may already be running in
> another process, or a system process may be using the port. To start
> this server you will need to stop the other process or change the port
> number(s).
>
> However, using netstat and TCPView, I've ensured that, in fact, no
> process has these ports open. If I change Tomcat to use other ports, I
> get the same message with the port numbers reflecting my changes.
> Any thoughts?
As far as I know, you will only see this message if the WTP Tomcat
support in Eclipse is able to open a connection to at least one of the
ports reported. I don't know how that can happen without the port being
open.
Cheers,
Larry
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02523 seconds