|
|
|
Re: IRC for EMF [message #511747 is a reply to message #511746] |
Tue, 02 February 2010 17:01 |
|
Hasan Ceylan schrieb:
> Sorry Eike,
>
> I though I posted to emf then I realized.
> That's why...
>
np ;-)
> Hasan
> Eike Stepper wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Hasan,
>>
>> Please do not cross post to newsgroups. And if it's really necessary
>> please do it at once unless you want us to multiply our replies, too.
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>> ----
>> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
>> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>>
>>
>>
>> Hasan Ceylan schrieb:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I originally proposed this in TMF group but it lacked the interest. So I
>>> decided to bring it up to EMF level.
>>>
>>> There is more and more IRC adoption in the OSS world. However IMHO,
>>> eclipse underuse this platform.
>>>
>>> What do you think about and IRC room for emf?
>>>
>>> I'll start #eclipse-emf and see how people react?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>
>
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
|
|
|
|
Re: IRC for EMF [message #511938 is a reply to message #511848] |
Wed, 03 February 2010 13:26 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33140 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070205090201010409080006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Tom,
Yes, I generally try to hang out there. It probably makes sense to keep
quite a general room like this because the traffic at this stage is
still fairly low.
Tom Schindl wrote:
> There is already channel named #eclipse-modeling
>
> Tom
>
> Am 02.02.10 17:40, schrieb Hasan Ceylan:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I originally proposed this in TMF group but it lacked the interest. So I
>> decided to bring it up to EMF level.
>>
>> There is more and more IRC adoption in the OSS world. However IMHO, eclipse
>> underuse this platform.
>>
>> What do you think about and IRC room for emf?
>>
>> I'll start #eclipse-emf and see how people react?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>
>
--------------070205090201010409080006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Tom,<br>
<br>
Yes, I generally try to hang out there. It probably makes sense to
keep quite a general room like this because the traffic at this stage
is still fairly low. <br>
<br>
<br>
Tom Schindl wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:hkbcu3$n9d$1@build.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There is already channel named #eclipse-modeling
Tom
Am 02.02.10 17:40, schrieb Hasan Ceylan:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello,
I originally proposed this in TMF group but it lacked the interest. So I
decided to bring it up to EMF level.
There is more and more IRC adoption in the OSS world. However IMHO, eclipse
underuse this platform.
What do you think about and IRC room for emf?
I'll start #eclipse-emf and see how people react?
Regards,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------070205090201010409080006--
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03363 seconds