|
Re: Use of Headless [message #483992 is a reply to message #483981] |
Thu, 03 September 2009 20:29 |
|
Hi Steve,
I think this is my fault. I published the Buckminster intended for the RC2 build of Galileo 3.5.1 to the wrong update
site. I'll try and correct this ASAP.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 09/03/2009 10:09 PM, Steve Jerman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to get a headless version of Buckminster up and
> running with a headless version of Tigerstripe and have run into some
> bundle versioning issues.
>
> If I use the headless commands from a 'full' copy of Eclipse with
> Subversive and Tigerstripe installed, I get UI errors from Subversive
> (which is I think why you have the headless SVN support).
>
> Alternatively, if I get the headless version of Buckminster and try to
> install all the necessary dependencies for Tigerstripe (in GMF etc). I
> get the following error:
>
> INFO: install 'http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo'
> 'org.eclipse.uml2'
> INFO: install 'http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo'
> 'org.eclipse.emf.ocl'
> INFO: install 'http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo'
> 'org.eclipse.gmf'
> Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency.
> [0]Software being installed: Graphical Modeling Framework Runtime
> 1.1.1.v20090114-0940-7d8B0FXwnKwGb15VuKFF0ELpPk0b
> (org.eclipse.gmf.feature.group
> 1.1.1.v20090114-0940-7d8B0FXwnKwGb15VuKFF0ELpPk0b)
> [0]Software currently installed: Buckminster 1.1.350.r10546
> (org.eclipse.buckminster.cmdline.product 1.1.350.r10546)
> [0]Only one of the following can be installed at once: [0.2]OSGi System
> Bundle 3.5.1.R35x_v20090817 (org.eclipse.osgi 3.5.1.R35x_v20090817)
> [0.2]OSGi System Bundle 3.5.0.v20090520 (org.eclipse.osgi 3.5.0.v20090520)
> [0]Cannot satisfy dependency:
> [0.2]From: Buckminster 1.1.350.r10546
> (org.eclipse.buckminster.cmdline.product 1.1.350.r10546)
> [0.2]To: org.eclipse.osgi [3.5.1.R35x_v20090817]
> [0]Cannot satisfy dependency:
> [0.2]From: Graphical Modeling Framework Runtime
> 1.1.1.v20090114-0940-7d8B0FXwnKwGb15VuKFF0ELpPk0b
> (org.eclipse.gmf.feature.group
> 1.1.1.v20090114-0940-7d8B0FXwnKwGb15VuKFF0ELpPk0b)
> [0.2]To: org.eclipse.platform.feature.group [3.3.0,4.0.0)
> [0]Cannot satisfy dependency:
> [0.2]From: Eclipse Platform
> 3.5.0.v20090611a-9gEeG1HFtQcmRThO4O3aR_fqSMvJR2sJ
> (org.eclipse.platform.feature.group
> 3.5.0.v20090611a-9gEeG1HFtQcmRThO4O3aR_fqSMvJR2sJ)
> [0.2]To: org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group
> [3.5.0.v20090519-9SA0FwxFv6x089WEf-TWh11]
> [0]Cannot satisfy dependency:
> [0.2]From: Eclipse RCP 3.5.0.v20090519-9SA0FwxFv6x089WEf-TWh11
> (org.eclipse.rcp.feature.group 3.5.0.v20090519-9SA0FwxFv6x089WEf-TWh11)
> [0.2]To: org.eclipse.osgi [3.5.0.v20090520]
>
> Not the OSGI system bundle conflict.
>
> Do you have any suggestions as to how I could work around this? Do you
> think I am better using the full version (in which case do you have a
> suggestion as to how to avoid the Subversive UI errors) or using the
> Headless version.
>
> Thanks
> Steve
> PS: Attached the headless script I used.
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02831 seconds